Hello. Sign in to get personalized recommendations. New visitor? Start here.

Bulldoze in Lieu of Foreclosure? One Frustrated Homeowner’s Solution

by Credit.com on 02/23/2010

This is probably not the best solution to the housing problem or the rising foreclosure issue, but that's exactly what one frustrated Ohio man did, according to an AP report this morning:

"An Ohio man says he bulldozed his $350,000 home to keep a bank from foreclosing on it.

Terry Hoskins says he has struggled with the RiverHills Bank over his home in Moscow for years and had problems with the Internal Revenue Service. He says the IRS placed liens on his carpet store and commercial property and the bank claimed his house as collateral.

Hoskins says he owes $160,000 on the house. He says he spent a lot of money on attorneys and finally had enough. About two weeks ago he bulldozed the home 25 miles southeast of Cincinnati."

Mr. Hoskins also spoke to local TV station WLWT and was quoted as saying: "When I see I owe $160,000 on almost a $350,000 home, and someone decides they want to take it — no, I wasn't going to stand for that, so I took it down."

Here's a clip of Terry sharing his story on WLWT:


This story is blowing up on the airwaves and the web and many are calling Terry a hero for standing up and sending a message. Others are speculating whether Mr. Hoskins will be prosecuted for his actions and end up in prison. What do you think? Share your thoughts in the comments section!

offers straightforward tips and advice to help you make smarter financial decisions. Visit Credit.com to sign up for your FREE Credit Report Card and find out where you stand today!

Comments

{ 2 comments… add a comment }

Kelly February 24, 2010 at 6:27 AM

Good example of what happens when people feel they have been abused by the current tax and banking systems. Unfortunately, now he’ll likely face criminal charges for intentionally destroying property belonging to the bank. And those tax liens won’t just disappear. More legal fees, fines, penalties, and restitution no doubt. He did not free himself from any of his financial problems. But if his action prevented him from “going postal” then we can be thankful for that.

Reply

jeff March 3, 2010 at 2:35 PM

Wouldn’t the logical solution for someone with a $350,000 asset and $160,000 in debt to sell the asset, pay off the debt and pocket the remaining $190,000?
Sounds like a better idea than bulldozing a house to me.

Reply

Leave a Comment

About Us

Credit.com News & Advice provides readers with unique insight, helpful tips and straight answers about their financial world. Our leading experts explore credit, loans, debt, saving, and identity theft topics. Meet our credit & finance gurus.