|
|||||
| News | Education | Answers | Forum | CreditBloggers | Status | |||||
|
Subscribe Print
|
||||||
Students Not Taking Advantage of Available Loans
As a sophomore at Calvin College in Grand Rapids, Michigan, Hope Start is quite resourceful at finding financial aid for college. This year alone, she took two jobs, applied for loans, found grants, and won scholarships to help pay her $32,000 in college costs this year.
But unlike during her freshman year, Start didn’t bother applying for a bank loan. “I didn't even try because I assumed it was going to be really hard to get one,” she told the Grand Rapids Press. A Reasonable Assumption...That Happens to Be False Given all the horror stories in the media recently about banks responding to the credit crisis by cutting off student loans, Start’s decision isn’t surprising. But that doesn’t mean it’s correct. Despite difficulties in the housing and credit markets, student loans have largely stabilized – with the help of the federal government. A law passed in 2007, before the credit crunch, authorized $20 billion in new college aid, including measures cutting interest rates on subsidized Stafford loans by up to half. Many students who qualify for cheaper federal loans apply instead for most costly private bank loans. Sometimes this is because federal loans require them to complete the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, or FAFSA, which can be complicated. The Obama administration is pushing for a bill that would simplify the application. On the private side, many banks have tightened lending requirements, making it harder to get a loan. But banks still receive government subsidies for Federal Family Education Loans, which are also government-insured. This double-dipping has raised protests from some quarters, and may end. But in the meantime, it offers students double insurance that banks will continue lending. Tips:
|
|||||||