Credit.com, Wherever you stand, we stand by you.®
->
Live Chat |  Contact Us | Login | En Espaņol

Home > Learning Center > Complete Guide to Credit > Chapter 3 > A Complex System
  Chapter 3
  How Credit Cards Work
  A History of Credit
  Three Kinds of Credit Cards
  How Merchants Get Paid
  The Web of Relationships
  A Complex System
  What This Means to You
  Conclusion
  Previous Chapter
  Next Chapter
  Contents

  Learning Center
  Credit Information
  Life Stages
  CreditBloggers®
  Tidbits® Newsletter
  Ask John
  Finance Glossary
  FAQ
 

A Complex System

The key is the processing companies—rather than the banks issuing cards—who act like the air traffic controllers for the system. The processing companies keep the transactions flowing.

But when these companies trip up, the fallout can be ugly—and show just how much power the processing companies have give and take money. The Alabama state court decision Pushmataha Plantation v. Nova Corp. et al. offers one example.

Pushmataha Plantation was a tourist destination in Alabama. Nova was one of the largest credit card processing companies in the U.S. Pushmataha sued Nova for damages related to alleged illegal, improper and unrelated fees that Nova charged to Pushmataha’s merchant accounts.

In June 1998, Pushmataha entered into a merchant bank card services agreement with Nova and purchased point-of-sale equipment from Nova for the purpose of processing credit card transactions.

In January 1999, Pushmataha received a statement for the month of December 1998 from Nova. In this statement, the plantation was informed for the first time that it would be assessed a one-time fee of $40 for Year 2000 compliance efforts Nova had made on its behalf in 1998.

In February 1999, Pushmataha received a statement for the month of January 1999. In that statement, the plantation was informed that Nova had charged a “miscellaneous fee” of $40.00.

The plantation claimed that Nova’s practice of charging miscellaneous fees was improper and not supported by any contractual agreement between the two parties. The plantation went on to argue:

…No disclosure is made at the time of the merchant services agreement that these charges will be imposed and no agreement is reached whether the customer agrees to pay these charges or fees. The fees and charges are imposed unilaterally by [Nova] without prior disclosure to the customer.

The plantation wanted the court to certify a class action lawsuit against Nova; Nova wanted the court to throw out the plantation’s lawsuit entirely. The court didn’t throw out the lawsuit…so Nova started to negotiate a truce with Pushmataha.

Next: What This Means to You

 

QUICK TIP