Home > Personal Finance > Credit.com’s Consumer Guide to the Proposed Debit Interchange Rule

Comments 0 Comments

Debit Interchange FeesThe Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 created a new section 920 of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (“EFTA Section 920”). This section is often referred to as the “Durbin amendment” for Senator Dick Durbin, who introduced it. It requires the Federal Reserve Board to issue rules relating to debit card interchange fees, network exclusivity, and transaction routing.

On December 13 2010, the Board submitted a proposed rule that would establish standards that can be used to determine whether debit card interchange fees received or charged by issuers are “reasonable and proportional” to the issuer’s cost. The proposed rule would also give retailers greater ability to use cheaper networks to process their debit card transactions. Credit card interchange fees are not covered by the rule.

What are Interchange Fees?

Interchange fees, also called “swipe fees,” are the fees merchants pay when they accept credit or debit cards. It averages 1-2% of the transaction amount. In the case of Visa and MasterCard transactions, a portion of the fee goes to the merchant’s bank, while the majority goes to the financial institution that issued the debit card. Visa and MasterCard don’t take a direct cut, but they are paid through their agreements with financial institutions.

Signature-based debit transactions (which often require consumers to choose “credit” at the cash register) are more lucrative to issuers than transactions where consumers enter a PIN, and fees also vary depending on the type of card used (reward versus non-reward, for example).

Retailers have called interchange fees a “hidden tax” on consumers, and have complained that the current system is not competitive. The National Retail Federation claims that swipe fees costs the average family $427 a year. Retailers estimate they paid $20 billion in debit card swipe fees in 2008, though Fed figures estimate retailers paid $16 billion in those fees in 2009. Either way, it’s a substantial sum of money and there will be winners and losers if it changes.

Retailers also complain that they have been prevented by card company rules from telling customers how much swipe fees cost them, assessing a surcharge for purchases made by plastic, or steering consumers to cheaper payment methods.

Card issuers, on the other hand, have maintained that cards speed up transaction time at the cash register, offer merchants a better level of fraud protection (as opposed to checks) and result in higher sales.

The Proposal

There are two main components to the proposed rules: fee caps and network competition.

Fee Caps: Two alternatives were proposed. The first would cap debit interchange fees at 12 cents per transaction. The second would allow issuers to charge a fee that is the average variable cost of processing a transaction, with a safe harbor of 7 cents per transaction and a cap of 12 cents. In 2009, the average debit interchange fee was 44 cents per transaction. The new rules would cut interchange fees (and revenues) by as much as 70-90%.

Competition: The Board has proposed two approaches to increase competition among the networks that process these transactions. Under one, all debit card transactions would be routed over at least two unaffiliated debit card networks which could mean one network for signature-based debit transactions, and another unaffiliated network for PIN-based debit transactions. The drawback of this approach is that millions of merchants do not process PIN-based transactions, and therefore, would have no competive options.

The other approach would require merchants to be able to route transactions over at least two different networks for each type of transaction (signature debit versus PIN debit).

What does this mean for consumers? >>>

Pages: 1 2

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team