Home > Credit Score > How Many Credit Reports Contain Errors? Take a Guess…

Comments 3 Comments

WrongJust how many credit reports contain mistakes? And how many of them are serious enough to have an impact on consumers’ credit scores?

It’s an excellent question and one that has not yet been answered adequately. Perhaps the most widely quoted survey on this topic was one conducted in 2004 by U.S Public Research Interest Group, which surveyed just 200 consumers and found that 80% of reports contained some kind of mistake, while 25% contained “serious” errors. While the credit reporting industry has widely disputed that study, to my knowledge, no other surveys have been released to refute those findings.

In order to get at an answer to the question of credit report accuracy, Congress directed the FTC to conduct a study of credit report accuracy. The study began in 2004 and continues through 2012, with a final report to be issued in 2014. Interim reports are due every two years. The 2010 interim report was issued on January 12, 2011.

[Consumer resource: How to Correct an Error on a Credit Report]

The study works like this:

–          Invitations have been sent by mail to a large number of consumers, with the goal of getting 1000 consumers to participate. The FTC is sending more invitations to consumers with below-average credit scores in an attempt to make sure those consumers are adequately represented in the study.

–          Consumers review their reports with the help of experts, and get their initial FICO scores. Possible mistakes are identified and the reports are sent to FICO for rescoring to determine how those mistakes may impact the consumer’s credit scores (first rescoring).

–          Consumers dispute mistakes with the CRAs.

–          If the reports are corrected, the corrected files are sent to FICO for a second rescoring.

It sounds like a much needed study. The results should be meaningful, given that the reports will be rescored after mistakes have been disputed to help determine the impact of those mistakes on credit scores. As the FTC describes it, “The study will reveal the main types of confirmed material errors, their relative frequencies, and impact of such errors on a consumer’s credit standing.”

[Featured products: Monitor your credit reports and scores]

On the other hand, the fact that this study was included in legislation passed in 2003 but won’t be fully completed until more than ten years later is pretty mind boggling. According to the 2010 interim report, fewer than 300 consumer’s credit reports have been analyzed so far. Why has it taken that long to put the study together and get it underway?

And while I do think that a government study was warranted here, I have to wonder why the industry didn’t do its own study years ago. Is it truly possible that credit reporting agencies are selling this data to lenders and insurers without knowing how accurate it is?

I am looking forward to the FTC’s final report, but it sure seems a long way off. I don’t believe it will change my basic advice, however: check your credit reports at least once a year and dispute mistakes.

© Chad Mcdermott | Dreamstime.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Pingback: Reminder: Check your Credit Bureau Report! « GetPaidNotPlayed.com()

  • http://www.credit.com Gerri


    Your point is well taken. Though keep in mind they have mailed many more invitations than the 1000 needed to get the sample. Those who respond will get help from an expert. So presumably it should be at least a bit easier than doing this on your own.

    Thanks for weighing in!


  • http://ThePhoenixAgents.com Heather

    My knee-jerk reaction was the same as yours: why should this take so stinking long?!

    But after thinking for a minute, and visualizing my most recent credit report… It’s 32 pages and contains notes about my first credit card, obtained when I was college. Even if we’re only focusing on payments in the past 24 to 36 or 48 months that could affect my score today, I’d be hard-pressed to find the time to slog through that many years of monthly credit card statements and cancelled checks to prove – or disprove – the info on my credit report.

    Maybe this is about too-busy consumers as much as it’s about glacially slow government bureaucrats.

  • Randy Johnson

    Why don’t they wait unitl 2024 or 2034 when the data will be totally meaningless.

    This just exhibits one of the problems with govrenment “solutions” to our problems, The name on the bill but take 53 pages to describe what they are going to do and how they are going to do it.

    That same effort could have produced a REPORT that would be statistically close to the one that will cost millions and take years.

  • Pingback: 8 Reasons to Use a Business Credit Card | Dichvugiare.info | Share 4 you free()

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team