Home > Mortgages > Risky Legal Strategy Wins Big for Maryland Homeowners

Comments 0 Comments

It was a bold legal strategy, and it proved enormously successful. As the result of what may the first-ever defensive class action ever filed in the U.S., GMAC Mortgage announced it will dismiss foreclosure lawsuits against homeowners in Maryland.

“This has never been done to our knowledge in the United States,” Tony DePastina, an attorney for Civil Justice, a consumer advocacy group in Baltimore, said of his legal tactic in a recent phone interview.

The lender in the case, GMAC Mortgage, had foreclosed upon homeowner Kevin Matthews. When Matthews contacted Civil Justice, the group’s attorneys read his foreclosure documents and saw a name they recognized: Jeffrey Stephan, a former GMAC employee who said in a deposition in December 2009 that he regularly signed 10,000 foreclosure documents a month. In most of those cases he never performed his actual job: checking to make sure that the documents in each foreclosure case were correct. Instead he just signed his name and skipped to the next case.

Since Stephan was involved in so many foreclosure cases, Civil Justice decided to try a kind of class action-in-reverse. Instead of suing GMAC for wrongly foreclosing on peoples’ houses, the group decided to try a class-action defense, filing the same arguments in many different cases: All foreclosures signed by Stephan were fraudulent and should be dismissed.

GMAC argued that class actions can only be used in offense, not defense, and asked the court to dismiss this novel strategy. The judge refused. GMAC backed down.

“They hired a very good attorney, and he could have litigated the hell out of these cases,” DePastina says. “He and GMAC chose not to.”

That’s not exactly how GMAC put it.

“We’re dismissing the cases but they will be re-filed,” Gina Proia, a spokeswoman for Ally, which owns GMAC Mortgage, said in e-mailed comments to reporters. “The intention is to re-file the cases to go through the new foreclosure procedures in Maryland.”

Many news reports have said the case will affect 250 homeowners. In fact, Civil Justice and GMAC don’t really know how many foreclosures Stephan signed in Maryland, DePastina says. It could be a few dozen, or maybe over 1,000.

Whatever the final number, anyone whose foreclosure was signed by Stephan, and whose house has been foreclosed upon but not yet sold at auction, will have their houses released from foreclosure. They get to start at square one, which in Maryland has changed since the passage last year of a new law requiring all foreclosures to go first to mediation to see whether the mortgage can be reworked to allow homeowners to keep their homes. Only if mediation fails can the foreclosure process begin again.

That’s a new step that applies only in Maryland. But Stephan signed documents foreclosing on houses in many other states, too. And many banks hired their own robosigners like Stephan to plow through documents without following the law.

DePastina hopes his class-action-in-reverse catches on in those states, too.

“I imagine that attorneys in other states will say, ‘Wait a minute, if they’re doing it in Maryland, why aren’t we doing it here?’” says DePastina. “Everybody’s supposed to play by the rules.”

Image © Ryan Stevenson

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team