Home > Mortgages > Symbolic Vote Passes to Kill Mortgage Programs

Comments 0 Comments

Foreclosure_Jeff_Turner_FlickrRepublicans in the House of Representatives voted Thursday to kill two new programs intended to help prevent foreclosure, arguing that government initiatives to help people stay in their homes have failed.

The effort to end the programs was largely symbolic, since it has little chance of passing in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

The Republican-led House Financial Services Committee voted along party lines to end the programs. One, called the “short refinance” initiative by the Federal Housing Administration, requires investors in mortgage-backed securities to agree to reduce the amount owed by at least 10 percent for homeowners whose houses are now worth significantly less than the original purchase price.

[Resource: How to Get Unemployment Benefits]

The committee also voted to end the Emergency Homeowners’ Loan Program, which would provide $1 billion for zero-interest loans to help homeowners who have recently lost their jobs.

“We should not waste taxpayer dollars on failed government programs that do not work and actually make things worse for struggling homeowners,” Spencer Bachus (R – Ala) said in a press release. “These programs may have been well-intentioned, but they’re doing more harm than good.”

Democrats countered that the programs should be tweaked, not scrapped. And they criticized Republicans for trying to end programs aimed at helping struggling homeowners while offering nothing in their place.

“The majority opinion seems to be foreclosures will happen … so be it … let’s make no effort whatsoever to improve these programs or let them survive,” said Rep. Barney Frank (D – Mass), the committee’s top Democrat.

Though both programs were included in the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill, passed last summer, neither one is up and running yet. The Federal Housing Administration has struggled to find lenders willing to participate in the short refinance initiative, as recently reported on Credit.com.

[Featured products: Monitor your credit reports and scores]

The Department of Housing and Urban Development has yet to launch the loan program for the unemployed.

This was just the first of what is likely to be many symbolic votes by the committee, intended to register Republicans’ displeasure with the Dodd-Frank financial reform act and other programs passed by Democrats in the last Congress.

A separate bill has been introduced calling for the end of the Home Affordable Modification Program. Aimed at encouraging loan servicers to modify mortgages, the initiative has been a complete failure, according to a recent study by the Government Accountability Office. The bill may be considered by the committee next week.

Image: Jeff Turner, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team