Home > Mortgages > Family’s Loan Modification Troubles End in Success, For Now

Comments 1 Comment

In March we told you about Bevin Beckage, a mother of three who spent nine months wrestling with Wells Fargo over whether she qualifies for a mortgage loan modification. The bank repeatedly lost her paperwork, broke promises to stay in communication, and ultimately denied her a modification based on incorrect information.

After Credit.com’s investigation, Beckage’s case was referred to the executive office at Wells. After just three weeks that office gave Beckage the news: She qualifies. The modification will save Beckage $600 a month.

“I’m just so happy!” Beckage told Credit.com.

Wells gave Beckage a temporary modification under the federal Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). Beckage’s interest rate will drop from the original 6.5% down to 3.5% for the first five years. From there it will increase to 3.75%, and after seven years it will lock in at a new rate of 4%.

[Related article: One Family’s 9-Month Trip Through the Loan Mod Twilight Zone]

Beckage plans to use the money she’ll save every month to pay down some debt. After that, it will mostly go toward day-to-day living expenses.

“We want to take the kids to the zoo,” says Beckage, who has a five-year-old daughter and three-year-old twins. “It’ll just help us live comfortably for the month, pay off some debt and save for the kids.”

Her first time through the modification process, Beckage went through a 1-800 number at Wells Fargo. It was a nightmare. She would mail and fax forms to the bank, which regularly claimed never to have received them. Her application bounced between multiple departments, often getting lost somewhere between, she says. Bank mistakes resulted in her case getting thrown out three times, which meant she had to start back at square one.

Her experience with the executive office was completely different. People in the office never lost her paperwork. They called her back when they said they would. They were nice.

“It was the easiest, least stressful experience I’ve had with them. It was pleasant, actually,” Beckage says. “I would have been OK being denied because at least I was getting attention and it felt like they knew what they were doing.”

[Related article: HAMP grants fewer Home Loan Modifications in February]

Wells gave her a trial modification, and told Beckage it should become permanent in July. “So I guess that means it’ll be permanent, and everything will be fine,” Beckage says.

Actually, the reality could be a bit more complicated. As we reported here, 27% of trial modifications under HAMP fail to become permanent. Many homeowners whose trials fail to continue are stuck with interest payments that immediately rebound to their original rates, plus they have to repay any of the money they saved on interest while they were in the trial.

In a perverse twist, then, a program that was intended to rescue people from foreclosure winds up pushing some of them right into foreclosure.

“Oh really? I didn’t know that,” Beckage says.

We’ll stay in touch with Beckage, and see what happens in July. If she wins a permanent modification, or for some reason is denied, we’ll let you know.

Image: striatic, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Pingback: Family’s Loan Modification Troubles End in Success, For Now | Daily Rosetta - Personal Finance News You Can Use()

  • Lenny Mahone

    I had almost the same experience with Bank of America. I was getting nowhere, until I contacted my Congressman, who sent a letter to the Leo’s office. Even still, it took almost 4 months to get our permanent modification approved, and another 8 after that until our new payment was officially in place. All told, we spent 18 months in the process. I’m still waiting to see if our credit history report will be updated to show normal servicing of our loan. I’m not holding my breath.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team