Home > Managing Debt > How a 3-Year Debt Payoff Plan Takes Twelve Years

Comments 1 Comment

The Credit CARD Act requires credit card issuers to disclose on your monthly statement how much it will cost, and how long it will take, to pay off your credit card balance if you just make minimum payments. It’s a provision that has been applauded by consumer educators, myself included. But all is not as it seems here, and consumers who take what their statements say at face value may find themselves still stuck on the proverbial treadmill, paying faithfully each month but not getting out of debt for a very long time.

Here’s the problem.

Statements list the total balance, and how long it will take to pay off that debt if you just make the minimum payments. Below that, they list the amount you’ll have to pay each month to pay off the balance in three years. (See the example.)

But, as three Harvard professors pointed out in a presentation before the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau:

“If someone makes no new purchases and pays exactly the 36 month number (listed on the statement each month), they will NOT get out of debt in 36 months. The 36 month amount is recalculated each month ‐ the payoff period will always be 36 months away.”

They go on to give this example: “With 15.32% APR (non‐reward rate), it will take a member with the average balance ($3900) paying her 36 month amount, followed by “minimum‐minimum” amount, 150 months to get out of debt.”

Those 150 months are a whole lot longer than 36 months!

When I saw what was happening here, it was one of those slap-myself-on-the-forehead moments. I’ve been among those who have told consumers the three-year payment amount is a great way to create a plan to get out of debt in a reasonable period of time.

But now my advice carries a big caveat.

I still think looking at the three-year payment amount on your statements is a great way to judge whether you can get out of debt on your own. Total that figure from each of your statements and then ask yourself whether you can realistically pay that amount faithfully every month for the next 36 months without charging and taking on new debt. If not, then your next step should be to seek debt help from a credit counseling agency, bankruptcy attorney and/or reputable debt settlement firm.

If, however, you total the three-year payment amounts from your statements, and realize you can afford to pay that amount each month without taking on new debt, then your next step is critical:

Stop reading that part of your statements!

You must commit to the amount shown on your statements the first month you commit to your 3-year plan. If you stick to that amount, and don’t charge anymore, you can be debt-free in 36 months. You can even set up your accounts so the payments are automatically debited from your bank or credit union account each month. (Of course, make sure the money is in your account to cover those payments when they auto debit!) This is the autopilot method. It’s simple and effective.

But there’s an even better way.

You’ve probably already heard that paying off your highest interest rate debt first saves the most money, and that’s true. So plug the information about your debts into a rapid debt repayment calculator. It will show you how to take that same amount of money and use it to get out of debt even faster. With one of these plans, you’ll pay as much as possible on your highest rate debt first until it’s paid off, then roll your “extra” money into the second most expensive debt, and so on. Programs like DebtGoal, ReadyForZero, or Zilch, can show you how to turbocharge your debt repayment plan this way.

As for the problem with these potentially misleading figures on statements, I imagine that since this problem was presented to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, they are taking a look at whether better disclosures are in order.  What we have now may be better than no information at all about the effect of minimum payments, but it may not be what Congress intended either

Image: lemonjenny, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team