Home > Credit Cards > Big Debit Card Changes Coming

Comments 1 Comment

Big changes are ahead for debit cards that retailers say will ultimately benefit consumers, though the banks beg to differ. A months-long, multi-million-dollar lobbying push by the nation’s largest banks to delay those debit card changes ended in failure Wednesday afternoon, clearing the way for new rules to take effect in July.

“This is huge,” says Ed Mierzwinski, director of the consumer program at the U.S. Public Interest Research Group.

The fight is over debit card swipe fees, known in the industry as interchange fees. Every time you swipe your debit card, your bank and one of the credit card networks (like Visa or MasterCard) charge the merchant a fee for processing the transaction. Those fees rose dramatically in recent years; currently, the average fee is 44 cents per swipe.

[Related articles: The Durbin Amendment]

The Durbin amendment, passed last year as part of the sweeping Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, requires the Federal Reserve to write rules limiting interchange fees to a “fair and reasonable” rate. The Fed decided to cap the fees at 12 cents.

That decision elicited protests from bankers, who argued the cut in revenue would force them to gut free checking accounts, and could even force some smaller banks to close. In response, the banks ramped up a massive lobbying effort to change, repeal or delay the Durbin amendment. Banks eventually threw their support behind a bill introduced by Senators Jon Tester (D – Mont.) and Bob Corker (R – Tenn.) that would delay implementation of new swipe fees by a year, and give the Fed more power to change the 12-cent cap.

Pretty soon, lobbyists started calling the Durbin amendment the “K Street Full Employment Plan,” since everyone on Washington’s famous lobbyist row seemed to have a Durbin-related contract. Seemingly every available ad space on every subway car in the city has been plastered with ads by the banking industry supporting the Tester amendment.

“The ads are everywhere,” says Ed Mierzwinski, director of the consumer program at the U.S. Public Interest Research Group. “People outside of Washington may not have heard much about this. But here, it’s everywhere you go.”

In the end, the banks’ efforts were for naught. The Tester/Corker bill won a majority of votes in the Senate, but it came up four votes shy of the 60-vote supermajority it needed to pass.

Bankers were angry at the loss.

“American consumers will now have to pay more for basic banking services, while big-box retailers go off and count their unjustified profits,” the American Bankers Association said in a press release.

[Featured product: Shop for prepaid debit cards on Credit.com]

Retailers countered that the reform will actually save consumers $15 billion a year, since stores will pass on their lower interchange fee costs in the form of lower prices.

“Congress came to the right conclusion last year—hidden swipe fees charged by big banks have driven up prices far too much for far too long,” said Matthew Shay, president and CEO of the National Retail Federation. “This is a landmark victory for American consumers that will give them the break from skyrocketing swipe fees that they have been seeking for years.”

Even if the Tester/Corker bill had passed, banks faced an uphill battle to win any delay to the Durbin amendment. They would have needed to pass similar legislation in the House, presumably a relatively easy task given Republican control of that chamber. Next they would have needed to reconcile the two bills. And then, somehow, they would need the signature of President Obama, who signed Dodd-Frank into law last summer and since then has urged Congress to stop monkeying with it.

Even before Wednesday’s vote, it appeared increasingly unlikely that banks would be able to accomplish all that in time.

“I just don’t see how the banks can get anything done before the deadline,” says Malory Duncan, general counsel for the National Retail Federation.

The Durbin amendment is currently scheduled to take effect July 21.

Image: Patrick Hoesly, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team