Home > Mortgages > Despite Big Glitches, Government Still Helping Underwater Homeowners

Comments 0 Comments

We’ve run several stories (including this one and that one) about how the federal government’s program to help people avoid foreclosure is an abject failure. Regardless, some people have still managed to get help and keep their homes. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two taxpayer-owned mortgage giants, helped over a million people refinance their homes in the first three months of 2011.

Some of the help has gone to people who are underwater, and owe more than their house is worth. Fannie and Freddie refinanced 130,204 mortgages in the first quarter in which the amount owed by the homeowner equaled between 80% and 125% of the mortgage. Of those, 16,894 went to people who were truly underwater, and who owed between 105% and 125% of their house value, according to a report by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees both Fannie and Freddie.

[Article: HAMP Fails to Save Homeowners from Foreclosure]

The old loans were already owned by Fannie or Freddie.

“There’s nothing wrong with letting these people refinance,” says Lawrence J. White , a former Freddie Mac board member and an economics professor at New York University. “It makes sense because it lowers the monthly payment, which reduces the likelihood of a foreclosure, which reduces the burden on Fannie and Freddie later on.”

In total, Fannie and Freddie have made 752,000 loan modifications through the Obama Administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) since the program started in April 2009. That’s far short of the administration’s stated goal of helping 4 million people avoid foreclosure.

[Article: We Must Kill Mortgage Mods to Save Them, Neugebauer Says]

In other areas, both Fannie and Freddie reported that their finances continued to improve since the government took control of both companies in 2008. About 4.5% of the mortgages owned by the companies are over 60 days delinquent, down from almost 6% at the end of 2009. The number of foreclosure starts continued to drop, from a record high of 339,000 in the third quarter of 2010 to 260,000 last quarter.

The majority of newly modified loans contained major breaks for homeowners. In 51% of loan modifications completed in the first quarter of 2011, the principal and interest was cut by more than 30%, according to the report.

Not all the modifications worked. Three months after modification, 9% of loans failed anyway. That’s actually an improvement over the fourth quarter of 2008, when 28% of modified loans failed. The improvement is partly due to the fact that “modifications in 2010 resulted in deeper payment reductions for a greater proportion of borrowers than in earlier periods,” according to the FHFA.

Image: Esther Gibbons, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team