Home > Credit Cards > Smartphones Won’t Replace Credit Cards Any Time Soon

Comments 5 Comments

As one who is totally fascinated with the intersection of credit cards and technology, I’ve been paying close attention to the buzz surrounding the use of smartphones as credit cards. It’s a burgeoning area and there’s heated competition among companies to be the first to come up with the Next Big Thing.

Google announced its plans for Google Wallet last week, asserting that it was the leader. Within hours, PayPal announced it was suing Google, claiming that a former employee (now in charge of Google Wallet) stole trade secrets and gave them to Google. I barely had time to think about this before Visa claimed that they are the ones who are ahead of the competition. Why do I feel like I’m back in high school where different cliques claimed to be the “real” cool group?

And then there’s Square (an unfortunate name while I’m using the clique analogy). Square and Google Wallet both use mobile devices for payment, but Google Wallet uses near-field communication (NFC), which requires tapping your phone at the check-out counter.

[Related article: Manage Student Loans With Your Smart Phone? Eh.]

Square is using an app called Card Case, so their approach is software-based and doesn’t use NFC. According to a post on Engadget, you have to first make a Square-enabled purchase at a participating merchant. At that point, you’ll get a text-based message that notifies you to install Card Case. When you make a purchase, you click open a tab in Card Case to get the payment process started.

You know what? Square lost me at “first make a Square-enabled purchase at a participating merchant.” Like all consumers, I’m really busy. And I have no intention of spending time at the register fooling around with an app. I also don’t want everyone in line with me to know my name. Apparently, you have to say your name at the check-out counter so your account can be identified.

With both Google Wallet and Square, I can see benefits for the merchants in terms of advertising. I’m not an impulse shopper so I won’t be tempted, just annoyed to see ads on my phone. I don’t want to see an ad telling me I can get another 10 percent off on shoes as I’m heading out the door.

But many people are impulse shoppers, so as a consumer advocate, I worry for these folks. It would be so easy to just keep spending.

I also have security concerns. I’m far from convinced that mobile devices are secure enough—at this point—to be trusted with all of my credit card information.

[Related article: Google Wallet’s Potential Security Hole]

Aside from security, there’s the convenience factor. I can swipe my old-fashioned credit card in less than 3 seconds. Yes, I actually timed it. I’ll admit I’m uber-organized (hate me if you must) so I’m pretty quick to break out the plastic. But really, even if it takes you six seconds, isn’t it easy to pull out a card or your wallet?

So here’s my question to all the companies who’ve been busy coming up with the Next Big Thing: What’s in it for the consumer?

Really, don’t try to sell consumers on an idea that doesn’t yet offer top-notch security. And please remember that consumers are busy and want to get out of the store as quickly as possible. Most of us don’t want to see our phones cluttered with ads or have our whereabouts tracked. If we’re all expected to change the way we pay for merchandise, you’d better darn well make it worth the effort.

Image: Steefafa, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Beverly Blair Harzog

    Hi Simon, thanks for your comments. I’m concerned about ID theft and think Google has some work left to do on this product. Having said that, I’ve no doubt it’s the wave of the future, and I’ll enjoy following the evolution of the product. But again, the technology needs to fit the needs of the consumers. I don’t think they’ve nailed that part yet.

  • http://www.sytaylor.net Simon Taylor

    There is no lack of people screaming ‘Credit Cards won’t be replaced any time soon’.

    Whilst the need to temper the puppy like excitement of start ups and technology companies actually launching something is valid. Those of us who work in the payments industry know all too well, payments make snails look positively rapid.

    It’s a pretty safe bet that it won’t happen overnight. In 2004 you could reasonably speculate ‘Facebook won’t happen any time soon’. That doesn’t mean it isn’t time to sit up and take this stuff very seriously though.

    Ignore the interest of some of the worlds most disruptive companies at your peril

  • Pingback: Mobile Banking? Yeah. Consumers Hate It.()

  • Pingback: Mobile Banking? Yeah. Consumers Hate It. « Near Field Communications / Smart mCommerce()

  • Pingback: NXP’s NFC chip sales to double thanks to Google Wallet – NFCNews | Google Wallet()

  • Pingback: Got Credit? » Blog Archive » Mobile Banking? Yeah. Consumers Hate It.()

  • lexdabear

    So you imply that Google Wallet, which obviously got approval by MasterCard, is less secure than a plastic credit card (with a magnetic stripe)?

    The link to the security hole article is pretty lame. No one saw the Google Wallet yet. I am pretty sure an insecure Android (rooted / virus) cannot access any credit card information from the Secure Element (separate chip in mobile, same as in your plastic credit card).

    • Beverly Blair Harzog

      Thanks for your comment. And no, I’m not implying that my magnetic stripe card is more secure than Google Wallet. Just that at this moment, there are too many security holes in Google Wallet for me to trust it with all my credit card information. That’s only one issue I have with it.

      My main point is that these companies need to work on creating technology that really improves the consumer’s life. Being tracked or having my phone inundated with ads doesn’t appeal to me. I do think that smartphones will become a viable payment option in the future. Just don’t think we’re there yet.

      • http://www.sytaylor.net Simon Taylor

        You misunderstand the nature of the product.

        Are you inundated with Ad’s when you go to http://www.google.com to search for something?

        They use data for relevancy. The privacy fear is a complete misnomer.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team