Home > Personal Finance > Obama Taps New Consumer Watchdog

Comments 0 Comments

President Obama announced on Sunday that he will nominate Richard Cordray, who aggressively pursued cases against banks over illegal mortgage practices, to lead new consumer finance watchdog agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Cordray already works for the bureau as director of its enforcement team.

The decision ducks a fight over Elizabeth Warren, the controversial former Harvard law professor widely credited with creating the agency.

“Richard Cordray has spent his career advocating for middle class families, from his tenure as Ohio’s Attorney General, to his most recent role as heading up the enforcement division at the CFPB and looking out for ordinary people in our financial system,” Obama said in his prepared statement.

[Related Articles: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]

The CFPB was created by the Dodd-Frank financial reform act of 2010. It seeks to do for mortgages and credit cards what the Consumer Product Safety Commission does for products like toys and microwaves, making sure that the products that consumers buy are safe. That became especially important after the recent housing bubble and crash, which was precipitated by risky mortgages that were designed to fail, according to the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission.

But in the year since Dodd-Frank passed, the bureau has become one of the most controversial aspects of the sweeping law. Republicans in Congress have introduced more than a dozen bills to cut the bureau’s power and cap its budget.

A group of 44 Senate Republicans also sent a letter to President Obama in May declaring that they would oppose any of the administration’s nominations to any regulatory agency until the administration agreed to change the bureau’s leadership from a single director to a committee.

Obama’s decision to skip over Warren and nominate Cordray instead appears unlikely to change the Republicans’ opposition.

[Article: How the CFPB Should “Regulate” Credit Reporting and Credit Scoring]

“Until President Obama addresses our concerns by supporting a few reasonable structural changes, we will not confirm anyone to lead it,” Senator Richard Shelby, the ranking Republican on the banking committee, said Sunday.

Many consumer groups and Democrats in Congress had called on Obama to nominate Warren to lead the bureau, since the agency was Warren’s idea in the first place, and her lobbying effort succeeded in creating it.

But Warren also created many enemies in Congress and on Wall Street. She almost seemed to revel in taking jabs at her opponents. “For years, Wall Street CEOs have thrown away customer trust like so much worthless trash,” Warren wrote in a Wall Street Journal editorial. “When they weren’t selling deceptive mortgages, Wall Street invented new credit card tricks and clever overdraft fees.”

Cordray, despite his aggressive pursuit of banks during his two-year term as Ohio attorney general, is a less controversial figure. He’s less well-known than Warren, and far more soft-spoken. While some consumer groups expressed mild support for Cordray on Sunday, they expressed regret that the Obama administration ducked the fight over Warren’s appointment.

“Elizabeth Warren was the best qualified to lead this bureau that she conceived—and we imagine Richard Cordray would agree,” consumer advocate Stephanie Taylor told The New York Times. “That said, Rich Cordray has been a strong ally of Elizabeth Warren’s, and we hope he will continue her legacy of holding Wall Street accountable.”

For her part, Warren was quick to step aside, despite rumors that she still hoped to take the director’s seat. Warren has been serving as special advisor to the president in charge of setting up the new agency. Cordray “was one of the first senior executives I recruited for the agency, and his hard work and deep commitment make it clear that he can make many important contributions in leading this agency,” Warren said. “He will make a stellar director.”

[Resource: Get your free personalized Credit Report Card]

Image: Wikimedia Commons

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team