Home > Personal Finance > Some Lesser-Known Parts of Dodd-Frank Reform Could Affect You

Comments 2 Comments

We’ve done a bunch of stories about the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which officially opened its doors to the public last Thursday. But there are many more aspects of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform act that also took effect last week, just one year after President Obama signed the bill into law. For a good, in-depth summary, check out this memo by Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, a Manhattan-based corporate law firm. In the meantime, here’s a quick run-down of some of Dodd-Frank’s key provisions:

1. Denied Credit? You Get to See Your Real Score.

One part of the law many consumers may notice is the new rule requiring lenders to tell you your credit score if they use it to deny you credit. That’s important because right now, consumers only get to see their credit report, with general information about their credit histories, once per year, and that report doesn’t include the actual score that lenders use to evaluate your creditworthiness.

So the next time you’re denied a loan, as of Thursday you can ask the simple question “Why?” And now the lenders have to tell you.

2. Earning Interest on Your Checking Account

Why is it that we earn interest (though lately not much) on savings accounts, but none on checking accounts? Dodd-Frank could change that. Prior to the law’s enactment, it was illegal for banks to pay customers interest on checking accounts. As of July 21, institutions are allowed to start offering such accounts (though they’re not required to).

[Featured Product: Looking for credit cards for bad credit?]

3. More Aggressive Representation for Consumers in Court?

So far, six federal agencies have been responsible for bringing lawsuits against companies accused of violating consumer protection laws.

As of July 21, that power transfers over to the CFPB. There’s a chance the new bureau will take a more adversarial stance in some of those lawsuits, since some agencies—notably, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision—have been consistent defenders of financial institutions in other areas like predatory mortgage rules.

4. Maybe Your Bank Will Stick Around a Little Longer

During the 1990s and early 2000s, big bank mergers made the news almost weekly. Under Dodd-Frank, though, institutions must prove they are well-capitalized and well-managed before they can merge. That could mean an end to shenanigans like Washington Mutual’s purchase of Commercial Capital Bancorp in 2006, two years before WaMu’s disastrous investments in subprime mortgages caused the bank to fail in what amounted to the largest savings and loan bankruptcy in U.S. history.

[Featured Product: Shopping for secured credit cards?]

Image: Official White House Photo by Lawrence Jackson, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Pingback: The 2012 Election & Your Credit Cards | The Presidency()

  • Chris Maag

    Thanks for writing, Charles. I’m glad you consider me to be elite. Maybe someday I can live up to that description. Now that you raise the question, I went back to check, and I see that you’re right, the change does affect business checking accounts. We’ll change the story to reflect that. Thanks again.

  • charles

    Please review your article Chris. You should do your homework. It was not illegal to pay interest on checking accounts. Banks have been doing so for years. They were often called Now Accounts.

    If you had done the research needed, you would have seen that it is BUSINESS CHECKING ACCOUNTS that could not pay interest. That is what the bill addressed. Not individuals. This is what is wrong with elites who have no business experience pretending to be business experts. Come on man.

    How many other credit.com articles are this poorly researched?

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team