Home > Student Loans > Stemming the Student Loan Crisis: A Lesson From India

Comments 1 Comment

Sometimes it helps to look beyond our borders for solutions to the troubled messes at home. As we know, student loans outstanding total roughly $830 billion in the U.S., more than total credit card debt. More alarming is the fact that many student loan borrowers are in default and unable to repay. Recent data obtained by the Chronicle of Higher Education found that 20% of federal student loans that entered repayment in 1995 have since gone into default. Another study concludes only 37% of college graduates in 2005 have been able to pay their student loan bills on time every month.

[Related article: Student Loans: The Next Bubble to Burst?]

India has its fair share of problems with student loans, as well; this year alone, the country reported a 45% rise in bad loans. To help control matters, Indian banks want to grade educational institutions based on the efficiency and repayment history of their students, according to Mint, a daily newspaper in India. In effect, colleges and universities with low ratings—as well as their prospective and current students—may be banned from the student loan market. In other words, if you want a loan from College A, where 50% of students have defaulted on their education loans, you may very well face rejection.

[Related article: Student Loan Default Realities]

Is this fair? Not entirely. Some prospective borrowers with good intentions of graduating, securing work and paying down their student loans may suddenly find themselves limited and unable to secure financing from lenders because the schools they’ve chosen to attend are on the “Do Not Lend” list.

But the proposed requirement—which still needs approval from the Indian Banks’ Association—may be worth the attention of American lenders and even the U.S. federal government, which doles out the majority of student loans.

For one, this rule would place more pressure on universities to see their students graduate and help them secure work upon graduation—the promise they make in their brochures and during campus visits.  In theory schools that fail to improve may see a drop in applications and eventually go out of business. “The move is a right step as many colleges in India are not outcome driven,” said Bharat Gulia, senior manager of education practice at Ernst and Young India told Mint. Secondly, the ratings system would [hopefully] makes students think more critically about the cost of college, how to best afford it, and which institutions will provide the greatest return on investment.

[Featured tool: Get your free Credit Report Card from Credit.com]

Image: Bill S, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team