Home > Personal Finance > CFPB to Warn Banks Prior to Enforcement Actions

Comments 1 Comment

Attention banks and financial institutions: If you’re worried that you might be the target of a government investigation, you’ll be interested to learn that the newest Federal watchdog intends to give you a heads up in advance.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau recently announced that it would begin informing individuals or corporations within its purview of any impending investigation or enforcement proceeding. This early warning policy is similar to the standard operating procedures of other federal agencies, particularly those involved in financial oversight. The Bureau would inform the potential target and allow them 14 days to prove that the enforcement is unnecessary.

[Free Tool: Take a look at your Credit Report Card]

“The Early Warning Notice announced today strikes a balance between the goal of fairness to those being investigated and our mission to protect consumers. This process will help us fulfill our commitment to transparency in enforcing the law,” said Raj Date, Special Advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury for the CFPB, in a press release announcing the policy.

Though a two-week hiatus during the course of an enforcement proceeding arguably does little harm to victimized consumers, it does provide the innocent with a way to pre-emptively avoid the costs associated with fighting an enforcement action. When the target happens to be guilty, the two weeks probably will not exacerbate the situation, especially given the fact that for those two weeks the wrongdoers will know that they’re being watched. In any case, the Bureau has not disabled itself from acting more quickly—even instantaneously—if it believes that urgent action is required.

The less jaded among us see this as merely an ordinary step taken by many federal agencies in their youth. However, those a bit more cynical see it as an early concession to the GOP, who you will recall view the Bureau with somewhat less than friendly eyes. Republicans have been taking the position that the Bureau is far too powerful, and because it will be run by a single director instead of a five-person commission (assuming that does not get amended away), Congressional oversight, and its often politicized appropriations process, will be a non-factor.

[Related Article: The Elephants in the Room: The GOP’s War on Consumer Protection]

The nomination of Richard Cordray to be the Bureau’s first director is in limbo (or is that purgatory?) and at the moment Republicans seem successful in delaying the Senate consent to Cordray’s appointment until certain provisions of the Dodd Frank Act, including those relating to the Bureau, can be negotiated away. Given that fact, and given the fact that the budget battle is looming close, it is likely that if the early warning procedure does in fact constitute an olive branch, it will likely have little effect.

Image: rightee, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • u

    This is a very interesting site.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team