Home > Mortgages > Obama Pushes New Mortgage Payment Relief Plan

Comments 4 Comments

In the wake of the recent settlement between some of the nation’s top home loan lenders and both federal and state governments, President Barack Obama recently announced more plans to help consumers with troubled mortgages.

President Obama unveiled a new plan to cut fees associated with refinancing any government-backed mortgage. In doing so, he highlighted that the discounts associated with the new plan would save the typical American family whose mortgage refinance was obtained before June 1, 2009, about $1,000 per year. The change could affect somewhere between 2 million and 3 million Americans who received refinances through the Federal Housing Authority.

“While the government cannot fix the housing market on its own, the president believes that responsible homeowners should not have to sit and wait for the market to hit bottom to get relief when there are measures at hand that can make a meaningful difference,” the White House said in announcing the plan, according to a report from the Christian Science Monitor.

The change comes as a response to fee increases by the FHA over the last few years that were intended to offset losses related to defaulted mortgages, the report said. It is intended to make the refinancing process easier for lenders and borrowers alike. Consumers who refinance will now have to pay an upfront mortgage premium of 0.1 percent of their loan’s total value, the lowest allowable rate, as well as an annual fee equal to 0.55 percent. In addition, they will face lower ongoing fees on their mortgages backed by the FHA as long as they make a 3.5 percent down payment on the purchase of a home.

This change in FHA policy is just the latest attempt by the Obama administration to make it easier for troubled homeowners to cut the cost of their monthly mortgage payments, though many of the other attempts have drawn some fire for the difficulty that many homeowners across the country had in qualifying for them. Often, even the most financially troubled families, many whose home values had slipped below the amount they still owed on their mortgages, had trouble meeting the stringent requirements mandated by the federal government, and these programs typically ended up helping far fewer homeowners than they originally intended.

Image: oddsock, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • michelle

    we went into a lower payment plan do to loss of job with wells fargo and now that our 6 mths is up since i got a job they now said i have to pay back what we did pay before? is this right?

  • Margie

    I have a first and a second the second is interest only i tried to refinance but do not have enough value. Both loans are in good standing I would just like to reduce my interest rate on both and include principal and interest on the second.

  • Carolyn Ewing

    We have a conventional loan, not FHA, what help can we get? We can’t get help from our mortgage company because we are not in default on our mortgage. We are now just paying interest only, we need it modified or a refi to include P&I. We have excellent credit, but our only income is social security and we own more on our mortgage than our house is now worth. What can we do????

    • Ryan

      Carolyn, you are in exactly the same spot as me! I would like to know the same question. The originally proposed mortgage relief plan that I remember would of allowed people like you and I to refinance and get our mortgages reduced. I have my mortgage through Bank of (thieves) America. What the hell happened to that is my question? I’m assuming it got shot down and got backburnered.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team