Home > Student Loans > Student Loan Rate Deal: Spared, Then Stung

Comments 0 Comments

As it turns out, Congress was able to get enough of its act together to resolve the subsidized student loan rate impasse—at least until next summer—but with a catch.

It used to be that eligible undergrads enjoyed a six-month interest-free grace period in between the time they tossed their tassels and the due date for their first loan payment, courtesy of the federal government. No longer. This last-minute deal forces subsidized Stafford borrowers to bear that cost.

What’s the damage? Well, for undergraduates who’ve borrowed the max under the program, the bill comes to $347.16.

While at first blush this may not sound like a lot of money, consider the larger problem: tuitions are continuing to increase, schools are cutting back on scholarships and grants, and college grads are still having trouble finding the good-paying jobs they need to pay the bills they’ve amassed.

[Credit Score Tool: Get your free credit score and report card from Credit.com]

Check Your Credit For FreeIn fact, this entire debate about “rate subsidies” is, in my view, thoroughly disingenuous. I say that because in this context, the term “subsidy” connotes below-market. While this may appear to be the case when government rates are compared with those that the private lenders typically charge, it most certainly does not mean that the DOE is taking it on the chin by offering something better.

As I’ve explained in a previous article, these loans are profitable, even after factoring in the cost of the interest that’s being covered by the feds while its subsidized borrowers are still in school—whether or not it does so for an additional six months.

Consequently, I can only conclude that the degree of that profitability was the point of contention. By extending the lower rate, the student loan program’s revenues wouldn’t be as high as they would have otherwise, which helps to explain why Congress was casting about for a way to make up the difference.

That’s truly unfortunate because our lawmakers’ time would have been better spent addressing the more pressing needs of the 10% of the borrowers who’ve defaulted on their loans, not to mention the 27% who are unable to keep up with the payments.

[Free Resource: Check your credit score and report card for free with Credit.com]

Image: USGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Laboratory, via Flickr

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team