Home > Managing Debt > The Obamacare Scare: Medical Debt Collectors in Scrubs?

Comments 0 Comments

Do you remember where you were last Thursday morning when every network interrupted its regular programming to announce the most anticipated Supreme Court decision since Bush v. Gore? It was not in the same category as the Kennedy assassination or Neil Armstrong’s “giant leap for mankind” moment, but when it was reported that Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion in the Affordable Care Act case that saved Obama’s individual mandate — the centerpiece of the legislation — time seemed to stand still, breaths were held and pundits and spinmeisters alike began dancing and whirling about like delirious dervishes.

There were the predictable high-fives at the White House; the “When I am elected, my first act on my first day in office will be to dismantle this legislative abortion (forget that I passed it in Massachusetts)” messaging of the Romney campaign; and the “We’ll maim this mother before the end of the legislative term this year,” coming from the NoMads — those icons of the Politics of No, the “I’m mad as Hell” folks from the Tea Party.

After this past week, few are willing to prognosticate what will happen in November, just as literally no one would have predicted that the Chief Justice would have been the voice of the majority in the National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius case.

[Credit Score Tool: Get your free credit score and report card from Credit.com]

Free Tool: Credit Report CardBut if by some chance through the trick-or-treat of a fickle November day, Mitt Romney and the Sons of the SuperPACs carry the election and are given the opportunity to gut the Affordable Care Act, I call upon them now to leave certain provisions in place — in particular those that protect Americans from the lowest of the bottom feeders in the current system: medical debt collectors.

Under the ACA, there are a few little known provisions governing financial assistance, billing and collection practices. One of them limits the ability of medical debt collectors to harass patients in need of medical assistance during the screening and admittance process and collect on previous unpaid medical bills (Mark Rukavina outlined these provisions on Credit.com in a great piece titled, “How Obamacare Keeps Debt Collectors Out of Hospitals“). 

What does it say about us as a nation where patients waiting in an emergency room or lying in (or near) recovery rooms after surgery can be confronted by a special “relative” or friend at their bedside. I am not talking about Aunt Susie or Uncle Bob. It’s your friendly embedded (didn’t they only do that with reporters in Iraq?) medical debt collector who is holding their own special brand of Get Well bouquet in the form of an invoice.

The Attorney General of Minnesota was not amused when reports surfaced that a company had slipped collectors disguised as employees into emergency rooms demanding that patients cough up dough before receiving treatment.

I understand that our hospitals are desperate to recoup an estimated $39 billion for unpaid services but what kind of world do we live in where collectors masquerading as hospital employees, perhaps in possession of personal medical information, demand that the feeble, ill, and even the dying pay outstanding medical bills they could not afford in the first place before seeking emergency care. Does the phrase “Physician do no harm” not apply when a bill is due?

[Related Article: Warning: Medical Debts CAN Hurt Your Credit]

It’s bad enough that the lowest rung of the collection food chain mercilessly pursue financially challenged patients once they have left a medical facility but to embed them into admitting, obstetrics, labor and delivery rooms as well as registration and scheduling functions where private patient information resides is quite another.

The FTC recently went after one collector for insecure collection and retention practices. It is my sense that information security and ethical practices may not necessarily be the prime directive of some debt collectors.

Reports have surfaced that patients are being asked for “point of service” payments before receiving treatments, as well as some being discouraged from seeking lifesaving treatments. Some of these folks, in documents proffered by Minnesota’s attorney general, recount tales of credit card payment requests and/or kind offers of waiting for patients to get their checkbooks out of their cars before service is rendered.

In response to two emotionally charged hearings he held in recent months, Senator Al Franken has introduced legislation to prevent debt collectors from approaching patients in emergency rooms, delivery wards and intensive care units and requiring health providers to take steps to protect patient medical information.

His legislation will extend to all hospitals existing Treasury Department regulations under the ACA banning debt collection activities in the emergency departments of federally subsidized hospitals. Further, his legislation would require health care providers to encrypt laptops and other portable devices that store patient health information — the favorite souvenir of medical identity thieves preying on the carelessness of health care workers or debt collectors.

Big things happened in America these past seven days. It still seems unlikely to me that Romney and the spawn of the John Birch Society and their latter day “dittoheads” stand any real chance of dismantling what Chief Justice Roberts (one of their heretofore heroes) so correctly preserved last week, but on the off chance the “NoMads” get a little more juice in Washington this fall, we must not allow them to undo all the good that has been accomplished over the past two years. Or at the very least, let’s all agree on a common enemy, because nobody really likes debt collectors anyway, do they?

[Free Resource: Check your credit score and report card for free with Credit.com]

This is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company.

Image: Adrian Clark, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team