Home > Identity Theft > A Beleaguered IRS Serves Up Billions in Fraudulent Tax Returns

Comments 1 Comment

Identity thieves who have fallen on hard times, take heart. The IRS could be the answer to your prayers.

The IRS may have delivered more than $5 billion in refund checks to you and your compadres who took the initiative to file fraudulent tax returns in 2011, according to Treasury Department investigators.

Keep your nose to the grindstone, and you’ll see a windfall in the next five years, when an estimated $21 billion could head your way, according to The Associated Press.

It’s easy to take potshots at the IRS. But in all seriousness, Congress needs to take swift action and provide support, or consumers will lose faith in the U.S. tax system.

[Credit Check Tool: Monitor your credit score and activity for free with Credit.com]

The Associated Press reports: “Although the IRS detected about 940,000 fraudulent returns for last year claiming $6.5 billion in refunds, there were potentially another 1.5 million undetected cases of thieves seeking refunds after assuming the identity of a dead person, child or someone else who normally wouldn’t file a tax return.”

U.S. businesses look out for obvious signs of fraud, or “red flags,” to help prevent credit-related losses. It’s about time the IRS started following suit. In fact, there is even a specific “Red Flags Rule,” which is part of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act. It requires companies to institute programs that make it easier for them to detect identity theft red flags in their daily operations. At the very least, the IRS should have something similar in place—guidelines to help easily spot signs of trouble.

It doesn’t take a fraud expert to figure out which returns are fraudulent. Case in point, there was one instance where the IRS sent more than $3 million to an address that was used to file 2,137 tax returns. You would think that a mere 50 tax returns originating from the same address would be enough to trigger an inquiry, but apparently not.  Another example cited a situation where three addresses were used for 500 returns that totaled more than $1 million in refund money. Again, chances are that when you have that many tax filers under one roof, they probably aren’t roommates or members of the same family filing separately.

[Related Article: Congress’ Profound Failure on CyberSecurity]

The simple reality is that the IRS needs more resources. More employees are needed to research filings and weed out fraudulent returns. Better systems are needed to weed through the data and spot these aberrations across various tax filing/processing centers. The resources we devote to this problem now will not only pay off, it could save taxpayers billions.

Thieves are also exploiting vulnerabilities in the way the IRS delivers refunds, according to investigators. Many cases of potential fraud involve the use of direct deposits and pre-loaded debit cards. If the IRS is going to continue to deposit returns on debit cards they need to have a maximum amount or a cap.

Frankly, the IRS should be spending more time and resources on tax-related identity theft prevention than it does auditing taxpayers. It seems to me to really be the best way to spend our tax dollars.

[Featured Products: Research and compare Identity theft protection plans at Credit.com]

This is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily reflect the views of the company. The column was originally published on Identity Theft 911 blog.

Image: Rojer, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team