Home > Credit Score > Should Utility Payments be Reported to the Credit Reporting Agencies?

Comments 2 Comments

Most consumers are aware that how they manage “standard” credit obligations — such as mortgage, automobile and student loans as well as credit cards — are recorded in their credit histories at the three major national credit reporting agencies (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion). This information is then accessed and used by lenders when evaluating a person’s application for credit.

But what about alternative credit — how you manage your utility obligations (energy utilities, telecommunications, media, etc.), for example? Should this information be reported to the national credit reporting agencies as well? Is this really credit? Some would position so — arguing the entity is providing the consumer with access to the service (like cable TV) before the consumer has actually paid for it when the bill comes due at the end of the month.

What you may not know is that derogatory late payment information associated with these “utility oriented services” is sometimes already being reported directly or indirectly (via collection agencies) to the credit reporting agencies and that negative information can negatively impact credit scores or be considered by the lender when evaluating the request for credit. What is not common practice is the consistent reporting of positive timely payments with utility type obligations made by the overwhelming majority of consumers.

The full reporting of this information would provide a more complete picture on a consumer’s ability to manage their credit (both traditional and utility combined). In addition, the full reporting of this information has the potential to help a lot of consumers gain entry into our “main stream” credit system as it would help consumers with limited to no traditional credit histories establish credit with the reporting of these utility tradelines, as well as potentially deepen their overall credit profiles. Consumers with thicker files who pay as agreed tend to have higher scores, holding all else constant.

Entities opposed to the reporting of utility payment information express concerns that the reporting of missed payments could have negative impacts on lower income and elderly consumers who may periodically skip payments on their utility type bills when experience cash flow challenges.

Another consideration is related to the utility companies themselves. If they start to report information to the credit reporting agencies, they would need to create internal processes to facilitate the consumer dispute investigation procedures. This represents an additional operating cost for them. In addition, many of the utility companies have to adhere to state level rules and regulations that would need review and potential revision if they even wanted to start reporting.

For additional information, several research papers on this subject can be found at perc.net. PERC researchers design and implement a variety of economic impact analyses including focus on U.S. consumer credit issues.

Image: Derrick Coetzee, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • pussycat

    Can the credit companies look at bank account status and (look for over drawns, deposit history, etc) and base decisions on that as well?

  • Pingback: Should Utility Payments be Reported to the Credit Reporting Agencies?()

  • Pingback: Should Utility Payments be Reported to the Credit Reporting Agencies? | Wordpress Real Estate()

  • Pingback: Should Utility Payments be Reported to the Credit Reporting Agencies? | Wordpress Real Estate 7()

  • http://www.eCredable.com Steve Ely

    Many companies have proven this information is extremely useful in predicting credit risk. FICO released the Expansion Score in 2007, which uses Alternative Data (like rent, utilities, and insurance) to evaluate risk. Experian recently released Extended View, which provides similar capability. Equifax has a product called Decision 360, which allows lenders to have a broader view of your risk profile, which leverages this same data. CoreLogic collaborated with FICO to develop the Core Score which uses this kind of data as well, with a particular focus on mortgages.

    There is plenty of evidence this information is extremely useful, which is why eCredable uses this same information to help the millions of people without a traditional credit history prove their creditworthiness to a potential lender.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team