Home > Mortgages > There’s Another Fiscal Cliff… and We’re Heading Right for It

Comments 1 Comment

With the presidential election over, the fiscal cliff is all anyone can talk about. The “cliff” is actually a drastic metaphor for a chronic political logjam caused by partisanship. There’s another cliff on the horizon that is about to hit much closer to home for a lot of Americans. It’s not the product of echo chamber hype. It’s a family killer.

Worse, unless Congress drops the obstructionist approach, this second cliff is going to be hit soon, and the fallout will be epic.

Five years ago, with the economy in a freefall, Congress passed a tax provision known as the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act. Enacted as the housing market imploded, with millions of families suddenly on the verge of losing their homes to foreclosure, the law exempted homeowners from paying a tax on certain forms of debt relief. It allowed millions of Americans to keep their homes, and avoid economic ruin.

Now, at a critical juncture in our economic recovery, that exemption is about to expire. The timing is atrocious; the stakes are incredibly high. But while the argument for extending it is a no-brainer, there’s no telling when — or even whether — Congress will see how urgent this is and take appropriate action.

To understand why this matters so much, it’s important to understand how burdensome debt relief was in the absence of this law.

When a lender agrees to forgive some or all of a strapped consumer’s credit card or mortgage debt in order to recoup at least some of the money owed, the IRS taxes the forgiven amount as extra income.

So while an underwater homeowner may feel lucky to have a $100,000 mortgage forgiven, that good feeling quickly disappears when she finds out that it counts as taxable income. Worse, often that phantom income places the debtor in a higher tax bracket. Having dodged the first bullet, they step into a bear trap.

So the crux of the problem is that the debt relief reduces future obligations for people who are short on cash, but it comes with a bill that requires immediate payment (or another payment plan) with cash that doesn’t exist. It’s the sort of bad idea you might expect from folks who have never been in a financial bind — like many of the folks in Congress who concocted it. But what Congress has done, Congress can undo.

The law, as it stands now, makes debt forgiveness tax exempt when related to a mortgage on a consumer’s primary home that is valued at $2 million or less, or was used to buy, build or substantially improve a primary residence, the borrower can avoid the tax burden that normally comes with mortgage forgiveness.

The expiration of that exemption is the cliff we should be talking about.

“It’s as if you’re handing someone a life ring and then you cut the rope,” observed Rep. Jim McDermott of Washington, author of a bill that would extend the tax provision.

In addition to treating homeowners to a gratuitous kick in the teeth, Congressional inaction on this tax provision would be a disaster. As economic momentum is kicking in, uncertainty regarding something as essential as homeownership will put a damper on consumer confidence.

Additionally, if the tax provision is allowed to expire, the market-friendly trend of banks approving short sales (nearly 340,000 of them in the year that ended in September), in which banks allow a property to be sold for less than the debt — reducing the glut of foreclosed homes, stabilizing prices, and cutting lenders’ losses — will come to a screeching halt.

Failure to extend this provision could also scuttle the hard-won $25 billion mortgage foreclosure settlement so painstakingly negotiated by the federal government — an agreement requiring banks to use the preponderance of the settlement money to help borrowers, with a minimum of $10 billion slated for principal reduction.

All of these measures will be savagely undercut if Congress doesn’t find the moral courage to act on this extension.

The stakes are incredibly high. With almost three million mortgage loans in or near foreclosure, five million more borrowers suffering with high-rate loans that they have not refinanced, and nearly 12 million borrowers whose mortgage debt adds up to $600 billion more than the homes are worth, it is clear that mortgage relief is broken. It is just as clear that this is no time for Congress to make things even worse for homeowners through institutional lethargy and partisan foot-dragging.

The New York Times, in a powerful editorial published Saturday, said, “The question now is whether Mr. Obama will use his second term to get mortgage relief right and, in the process, put the economy on a firm footing.” The same question applies to Congress — and one excellent way for Congress to demonstrate its resolve would be to put aside the punting, name-calling, and stalling and extend the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act.

Another, as the Times notes, would be to revise Senate rules to enable rapid confirmation of a new director for the agency overseeing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — one who will not oppose efforts to reduce principal balances on underwater loans, as acting director Edward DeMarco has unwisely done. A third would be to pass two bills introduced by Senators Merkeley, Boxer, and Menendez to expand refinancing and principal reductions.

In a word, it’s time for Congress to put aside childish things, learn the lessons of the last election, and take seriously the problems of the American people. American homeowners are still wobbling on the edge of a cliff. Our political leaders have one month to pull them — and the U.S. economy back from the brink. While the fiscal cliff gets all the attention, the mortgage cliff is just as steep, and just as perilous. If American consumers take another big fall, our leaders are almost certainly not far behind.

Image: joe goldberg, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team