Home > Credit Cards > The Pros and Cons of Revolving Credit Card Rewards

Comments 0 Comments

[UPDATE: Some offers mentioned below have expired and/or are no longer available on our site. You can view the current offers from our partners in our credit card marketplace. DISCLOSURE: Cards from our partners are mentioned below.]

The one thing that all reward credit card users love is the idea of earning bonus rewards. An extra point or two per dollar is nice, but what we really want is to earn as much as five points per dollar spent on our purchases. Sadly, there are no cards that offer 5x rewards on all purchases, just the occasional card that offers 5x rewards on narrow categories of transactions such as restaurants or office supply stores. At the same time, there is plenty of competition between credit cards that offer 5x rewards on spending categories that change each quarter. These cards include the Chase Freedom, Citi’s Dividend Platinum Select, and Discover’s More card.

But do these ever-changing bonus rewards programs make sense for most cardholders? Let’s take a look at the arguments for and against these cards, and then we’ll see who these types of products are best for.

The Benefits of Credit Cards with Revolving Bonus Categories

The nice thing about all three of these credit cards that feature rotating categories of bonus spending is that cardholders can earn extra points throughout the year with no annual fees. With the Chase and Discover cards, bonus points can be earned on up to $1,500 of qualified spending each quarter, and $6,000 per year with the Citi card. Fully utilized, these bonuses would equal 24,000 additional points (beyond the single point normally earned per dollar spent), worth $240. This is a substantial reward, especially as these cards have no annual fee.

The Arguments Against These Products

The potential to earn additional rewards is a simple motivation for the cardholder, but consider what the card issuer’s incentive is to offer these rewards. From the bank’s perspective, rewards exist to promote loyalty and to encourage spending. And when card holders are presented with rotating categories of spending bonuses, it is inevitable that many will increase their spending to earn these rewards. And therein lays the problem for customers; even with 5% cash back, cardholders are still losing 95% of their money when they make an unnecessary purchase in order to earn a reward.

If that wasn’t bad enough, cardholders must jump through several other hoops just to have a chance of earning these rewards. First, each of these products requires cardholders to register for the bonus categories of spending each quarter. The only rationale for this requirement appears to be denying rewards to those who fail to do so. In addition, receiving a bonus is dependent upon the proper application of merchant codes to a transaction. For example, department stores are often a feature bonus category, and discount stores are typically ineligible. But what is a department store? Does Sears qualify? How about Target or K-Mart? Ultimately, cardholders may only know which purchases earn a bonus when they receive their statement.

Finally, put the $240 potential bonus into perspective. At the moment, there are many credit card sign up bonuses worth far more. For example, the Sapphire Preferred card from Chase offers 40,000 Ultimate Rewards points worth $400 in cash back or $500 in travel, twice the maximum value of any of these cards. Other examples include cards with enough miles to travel to Europe round-trip, worth at least $1,000.


Credit cards with rotating bonus spending categories can be a good deal, but only to cardholders who can remember to register for these promotions and resist the temptation to spend more money to earn bonus points. On the other hand, those who carefully select competing cards can easily earn more rewards though sign-up bonuses and spending in perennial bonus categories. By understanding the advantages and disadvantages of these popular cards, consumers can choose the product that best meets their needs.

[Credit Cards: Research and compare rewards credit cards at Credit.com.]

Image: Andres Rueda, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team