Home > Personal Finance > Is Personal Finance Gender-Neutral?

Comments 0 Comments

Women's Day: Is Personal Finance Gender-Neutral? Today is International Women’s Day, a day that’s often devoted to commemorating the accomplishments of women, including their economic, social and political achievements. As a personal finance blogger, my professional interest is, of course, in the first topic: in particular, how women are doing financially.

There’s no doubt that compared with men, women have their work cut out for them when it comes to managing and planning their financial lives. For example, it’s well-documented that:

  • Women generally earn less for the same work as men. Usually that translates to women earning about 80% of what men earn for similar jobs.
  • Women live longer, which means they need greater financial resources in retirement. At age 85, there are twice as many women as men. On average, women who reach age 65 can expect to live almost 20 more years, and predictions indicate that nearly one third of women who reach age 65 can expect to reach age 90, according to the National Education and Resource Center on Women and Retirement Planning.
  • Women are likely to be charged more — 30% to 50% more — than men for everyday products. These include such mundane items as shaving cream, haircuts, body wash and even pain relievers, according to Consumer Reports. The same goes for big-ticket items like home loans or cars, according to the Consumer Federation of America.

[Credit Score Tool: Get your free credit score and report card from Credit.com]

Overall, when it comes to personal financial planning, “the gender gap is widening, with women falling further behind in many key areas of financial planning, most notably money management and investing,” says Financial Finesse in its 2012 report on the gender gap in personal financial literacy.

There is a danger, of course, in lumping people together by gender. Any discussion of women vs. men is likely to touch upon stereotypes that may seem condescending to some. (For the record: I hate shopping for shoes.)

And there’s plenty of valid criticism of the idea that we even feel the need to talk about financial management specifically for women. An article by Hannah Seligson in Slate, for example, took a jab at the “women as shopaholics” myth and questioned “why so many financial advice books perpetuate the false notion that women are bad with money.”

Free Credit Check & MonitoringWeakness or Strength?

Yet there is no denying that numerous surveys have found a difference in women’s attitudes about money compared to men. The question is whether those different attitudes are a help or hindrance, and what we can learn from them.

For example, take the fact that women generally report being less confident about their finances than men. Just one example: Prudential’s 2012-2013 survey, Financial Experience and Behavior Among Women, women said they are far less confident that they will meet their financial goals and feel less prepared to make wise financial decisions than men. They are twice as likely as men to describe themselves as financial “beginners” (15% of women vs. 7% of men).

A lack of confidence can be problematic if women aren’t taking enough investment risk to make their money last throughout retirement, for example, or if they are putting off crucial financial planning tasks as a result. For example, Financial Finesse found that only 25% of women reported rebalancing their investment accounts to keep their asset allocation plans on track, compared to 49% of men.

[Related Article: Women More Inclined to Take Financial Advice Than Men]

But that lack of confidence can also be a benefit. Women are also less overconfident, or “irrationally confident,” in most areas, according to research from Barclays Wealth. For example: Female investors are less likely to overtrade their investment accounts. One study in The Quarterly Journal of Economics found that men trade 45% more than women. Trading reduces men’s net returns by 2.65 percentage points a year as opposed to 1.72 percentage points for women.

Despite that lower level of confidence, women want to be involved in making important decisions about their future. The Barclays Wealth report found that, “Though women often express lower confidence about their financial expertise, they do not necessarily simply want to delegate decision making to an investment manager and are less likely than men to use other people to help them reach their financial goals.” In the Prudential survey, women tended to identify themselves as collaborators when buying financial products, “with 44% saying they usually rely on some input from a professional advisor but make their own decisions.”

Women’s Economic Power Grows

Despite the gender gap in financial confidence and personal financial literacy, the economic future of women continues to hold promise. As Liz Davidson, CEO of Financial Finesse points out, “Women are seeking financial education and information at very high rates — typically about 2 to 1 compared to men — and are taking the education to heart.” According to the Barclays Wealth report, “Women across the globe account for up to 80 per cent of purchasing decisions and according to the World Bank, women will control a GDP that is bigger than that of India and China combined by 2014.”

That kind of economic power forces all of us — male and female — to pay attention to the strides women are making financially, and to explore how to help empower women. We can accomplish this without reinforcing negative stereotypes. And because women often contribute to the financial well-being of their family and community, we all benefit when we do.

What do you think? Are women and men different when it comes to money? Share your comments below.

[Free Resource: Check your credit score and report card for free with Credit.com]

Image: Jupiter Images

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team