Home > Mortgages > Double Whammy: Mortgage Settlement Payments Will Be Taxed

Comments 2 Comments

If you are one of the more than 1.8 million people who have received a check from the Independent Foreclosure Review (IFR) settlement — or if you have one coming — don’t spend it all in one place. These payments are considered taxable income for state and federal income tax purposes and come tax time, Uncle Sam or your state taxing authority will want their share.

Here are the various ways these payments may be taxed:

Base payments: The base payment is a lump sum amount that doesn’t reimburse the taxpayer for any particular amount. If the amount is $600 or more, it will be reported to the IRS using form 1099 MISC. Keep in mind this is not canceled debt, so the Mortgage Debt Forgiveness Tax Relief Act exclusion that allows many taxpayers to exclude canceled or forgiven debt from their income does not apply here.

Return of Interest Paid: Here, some of the interest that was paid to the lender previously by the borrower is refunded. If the amount is $600 or more, a Form 1098 reporting this amount will be filed with the IRS. If the taxpayer previously deducted mortgage interest, this amount may be taxable. Here’s how the IFR website explains it:

If the borrower previously deducted mortgage interest on the loan that is the subject of the payment, then the payment may be taxable in the amount of the tax benefit the borrower received from a mortgage interest deduction in a prior year.

I can already anticipate some of the questions this one will generate. Who determines which year of interest this refund covers? Does this mean the taxpayer amends a previous year’s return to back out that deduction, or report it as interest received in 2013 — or both? This may create all kinds of confusion.

“Absent any further guidance from the IRS, I would say it would be taxed as interest income,” says Marina Parkin, CPA, a partner with Koontz & Parkin. “I don’t anticipate the need to go back and amend the returns.”

Return of Equity: Here, the borrower is reimbursed for lost equity. No 1099 will be issued but the IFR website warns that “the amount may still be subject to taxation depending on the borrower’s individual circumstances.”

Interest on Other Payment Components: If the settlement required that interest be paid on any of the other payments (such as base pay, for example) and the amount is $600 or more, it will be reported on a 1099 INT. That’s the same form you receive if you earn interest on your savings or checking account. Again, it may be taxable.

Return of Fees You Paid: This amount won’t be reported to the IRS. Again, however, borrowers are given a vague warning that these amounts may be taxable.

Tax Withholding: Some payments may have already been issued with taxes withheld. As the IFR website explains:

If a borrower does not return tax information on the Form W-9 as requested by the Paying Agent, then the Paying Agent is required by law to automatically withhold certain amounts. These amounts will be subtracted from the borrower’s payment and noted in the letter enclosed with the check. The Paying Agent will report such amounts to the IRS and to borrowers on a Form 1099 MISC and/or a Form 1099 INT. The Paying Agent will deposit the amounts withheld on the borrower’s behalf with the IRS or the appropriate state agency and mail the Form 1099 MISC and/or a Form 1099 INT to the borrower in the first quarter of 2014.

I can’t wait to see how this one turns out. The Paying Agent, Rust Consulting, has already had problems with bounced checks and failure to correct addresses for recipients, so it will be really interesting to see how they manage to correctly handle the tax withholding, and fix mistakes.

Legislation that would exempt these payments from taxes was introduced in Congress last year, but did not pass and no similar bills appear to have been introduced yet this year.

The IRS may issue further guidance by the time taxpayers must file their 2013 returns. But if it’s anything like the instructions for 1099-C and 1099-A forms, more than a few people will feel lost, and may have to hire a tax professional to assist them.

Parkin’s current view is that taxpayers will have to report the income based on the type of 1099 issued. “If a 1099-INT is issued, the income has to be reported as interest and if 1099-MISC is issued, income would show up on the ‘other income’ line of the tax return.” She raises the possibility of another potential snag for those who prepare their own returns: “Make sure when you include the amount in ‘other income’ that you don’t accidentally make it subject to self-employment tax as that income goes on the same line of the tax return.”

The good news (if it can be called that) is that many settlement checks are for relatively small amounts — $300-$500 seems to be the norm — which means no 1099 will be issued to those recipients. Still, they should keep in mind that the IRS requires taxpayers to report all taxable income even if a 1099 isn’t issued.

For those who endured a foreclosure or short sale and have already grappled with a 1099-C and/or 1099-A form reporting canceled debt, the new 1099 and the tax bill that may result from it adds insult to injury. “It’s just a never ending story for those affected,” observes Parkin.

In the meantime, the banks’ armies of corporate tax pros don’t have to worry about the pesky issue of taxes on the settlement: they’ve been given a free ride and get a tax deduction for these payments. “It’s kind of a hidden give-back to the wrongdoers,” says Phineas Baxandall, Ph.D., Senior Analyst and Program Director for Tax and Budget Policy for U.S. PIRG, an advocacy group that is fighting to close corporate tax loopholes like this one.

“There’s something really perverse about that,” he adds. “The folks who have done nothing wrong have to pay taxes on income that was meant to restore the way things really were, whereas the company that committed wrongdoing gets a taxpayer subsidy.”

Image: iStockphoto

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Amanda Johnson

    And none of the amounts can even begin to make up for having your credit destroyed for the next 10 years!!!!! Let alone pay for the equity you already had in the home. This is permanent damage lasting years.

  • http://binarym.com/ Matt McInvale

    What a bummer.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team