Home > Credit Score > How Credit Scores Predict Your Behavior

Comments 0 Comments

Credit scores, as with most attempts to make sense of our world, operate on the assumption that the near future will look a lot like the recent past, and that going forward, people can be expected to behave pretty much as they always have. That is, credit scores base their predictions of the future on their knowledge of the past.

To leverage this knowledge of the past with the idea of building a crystal ball view into the future, the people who build credit scores thoroughly analyze credit bureau information to understand how consumers have gotten to where they are now, and, most importantly, which of the credit bureau data can be used to predict specific future credit behavior for all consumers.

Since most people will exhibit the same behaviors, good or bad, for years at a time, it’s not hard to build a scoring model that simply predicts that people with bad credit today will have bad credit tomorrow, and that people with good credit today will have good credit tomorrow. The trick in credit score building is to predict which consumers with problem histories today are most likely to turn the corner and become low risk — and thus profitable — for lenders in the future, as well as identifying credit applicants who may look good now, but who appear to be headed for financial trouble.

The information used to observe such consumer credit behavior is found in the vast quantities of credit bureau data held by the three major credit bureaus: Equifax, Experian and TransUnion.

A key feature of the credit score building process is a “two-snapshot” method of looking at the data. By observing credit reports of a large sample of consumers as of two points in time — the beginning and ending of a two-year period — scoring analysts are able to simulate a laboratory-like study of consumer behavior:

  • Snapshot 1 — a set of credit reports for a large set of consumers at one point in time, e.g. January 1, 2010
  • Snapshot 2 — another set of credit reports for the same consumers as in Snapshot 1, only two years later, e.g. January 1, 2012

The score developers observe the 2012 credit behaviors for these consumers, such as how they pay and how much they owe, and then take a look back at the 2010 data in search of past behavior patterns leading up to what was seen in 2012. For example, if a high proportion of people who filed for bankruptcy during that two-year period of 2010-2012 showed late payments on their 2010 reports, while at the same time a high proportion of people who paid all obligations on time during that two-year period had very few late payments as of 2010, it could be concluded that people with late payments today are more likely to file for bankruptcy over the next two years than people with no late payments on their current credit reports.

This kind of information is said to be predictive of future behavior, and is likely to make up the credit scoring factors that become the characteristics of a credit scoring formula. The most predictive of these factors are placed in a “score card” with points assigned for weighting according to their predictive value — with the most predictive characteristics assigned the most possible points. The sum of all points achieved for these factors becomes the credit score representing the risk for a particular consumer.

With the benefit of hindsight, it is now commonly known that consumers pose lower future credit risk when they:

  • Make all payments on time
  • Keep credit card balances low
  • Have many years of credit experience
  • Open new accounts only occasionally
  • Have a good mix of credit experience

Sound familiar? It should, as these results come from many years of research into the predictive value of credit bureau data, and not only remind us that people who demonstrate positive credit management practices at the beginning of any time period are most likely to be demonstrating these same attributes later on, but also that many consumers deviate from their past behavior — either in good or bad directions — and that for lenders the ability to identify these consumers is where the money is.

Image: iStockphoto

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team