Home > Student Loans > Scoring Sallie Mae: How Student Loan Servicers are Rated

Comments 0 Comments

While customer service isn’t the first thing people associate with student loan servicers, it has a large role in determining how much business servicers get from the government.

Each quarter, the Department of Education issues a performance report on Direct Loan servicers, and it released the final report of the 2012-2013 year in August. An analysis of the report by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau suggests Sallie Mae came out on the bottom, largely a result of poor customer satisfaction scores.

The Education Department assigns loan volume to the four largest servicers — FedLoan Servicing (PHEAA), Great Lakes, Nelnet and Sallie Mae — based on scores that account for customer satisfaction and their ability to get borrowers to pay the loans. Borrowers, schools and federal personnel complete satisfaction surveys, and the servicers are scored from 0 to 100 on the American Customer Satisfaction Index. Additionally, servicers are ranked by default rates by number of loans and by dollar value, and the combination of their customer satisfaction and default rankings determine their loan volume.

Satisfaction scores throughout the year ranged from 66 (Sallie Mae, second quarter, federal personnel survey) to 83.33 (Great Lakes, first quarter, school survey). On average, school surveys generated the highest scores and federal personnel surveys gave the lowest scores, and each of the servicers’ average satisfaction scores were within about 4 points of each other. Sallie Mae and Nelnet were the only two to have scores in the 60s, the result of federal personnel surveys.

“We’re pleased that our default prevention efforts continue to assist customers and save money for taxpayers, and that the competitive model has yielded improved service for customers across the board,” said Sallie Mae spokesperson Patricia Nash Christel, in an email statement, commenting on the scores. “We’re focused on our customers’ experience and continually improve technology and operational processes for their benefit.”

Theoretically, the scoring holds servicers accountable and provides the motivation to improve their offerings for borrowers. Regardless of how that all works out, here’s how the servicers fared this last academic year.

Sallie Mae

Sallie Mae appears to bring up the rear in performance and therefore will likely receive the least amount of loans from the government, according to the CFPB. While it ranked second in both default categories, it came in last for borrower, school and federal personnel satisfaction.

Great Lakes

Customers seem to be happier with Great Lakes. Borrowers and schools gave it top scores in satisfaction, and federal personnel ranked it second. However, Great Lakes isn’t so great when it comes to making borrowers pay. It ranked fourth in both default categories.

FedLoan Servicing (PHEAA)

PHEAA placed third in both default categories, but customer reviews were mixed: first by federal personnel, second by schools and third by borrowers. That mix was good enough to make PHEAA second overall.


While Nelnet didn’t get the high customer satisfaction marks that Great Lakes enjoys, it came out on top among the group. Nelnet boasts the lowest default rates from the last academic year, and borrowers scored them second for customer satisfaction. It ranked third for schools and federal personnel.

As the CFPB pointed out in its blog post, borrowers can’t just call and change their servicer, not that changing servicers is a picnic, anyway. But loan consolidation may allow for such a change, in addition to the other benefits it brings. Before initiating such a shift in finances, consumers need to understand how their student debt load fits into their overall financial picture, which they can do for free using Credit.com’s Credit Report Card.

Image: Hemera

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team