Home > Mortgages > The Most and Least Affordable Places to Live

Comments 0 Comments

Only in eight of the largest 25 U.S. metropolitan areas can a median-income household afford a median-price home, according to a review by Interest.com. Last year, 14 of the 25 were affordable for middle-income homeowners.

Salaries have not kept up with rising home prices across the nation, particularly in coastal cities, with San Francisco ranking as the least affordable of the 25 largest cities. On average, home prices in these cities rose 16%, while incomes grew by 3%. Rising interest rates also contributed toward less affordability. Interest.com ranked a city’s affordability based on its median income’s relationship to median home price. In San Francisco, for example, the median income falls nearly 48% short of what is needed to buy a mid-priced home.

On the other end of the spectrum is Atlanta, where the median household income is 25% greater than what is needed to buy a median-priced house. Real estate experts outlined the differences between these locations, like geographical limitations in the Bay Area and room to expand around Atlanta.

The Most Affordable Cities

In these metro areas, the median income exceeded the amount needed to buy a mid-priced home by more than 11%. Of the 25 largest metro areas, Detroit and Pittsburgh are also among the five cities with the lowest median incomes.

  1. Atlanta (+24.92%)
  2. Minneapolis (+23.86%)
  3. St. Louis (+17.94%)
  4. Detroit (+16.87%)
  5. Pittsburgh (+11.33%)

The Least Affordable Cities

While San Francisco has one of the highest median incomes of the 25 largest metro areas, it doesn’t make up for the highly competitive real estate market. Conversely, the Miami area has one of the lowest median incomes, which results in houses being less affordable.

  1. San Francisco (-47.93%)
  2. San Diego (-37.71%)
  3. New York (-35.82%)
  4. Los Angeles (-30.31%)
  5. Miami (-24.56%)

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team