Home > Personal Finance > Why Many Americans Aren’t Concerned About a National Debt Default

Comments 3 Comments

With everyone from the Treasury Department to the International Monetary Fund to the World Bank to several of the country’s top economists warning about massive international economic disruption if the U.S. fails to raise the debt ceiling, thereby triggering a default, one might think that Americans would be a shade nigh of collective hysteria — and calling, emailing, texting or sending flocks of carrier pigeons to their elected representatives to complain — about their own financial prospects if Congress doesn’t act.

And yet a recent Credit.com poll shows that almost 30% of our fellow citizens say they’re not concerned about interest rates going up for any common loan or line of credit, and almost 29% say they’re not concerned about the impact on their own financial futures — including the health of their retirement accounts or their job prospects.


On the one hand, it’s jarring to see how many people don’t recognize that Congress’ inability to resolve yet another crisis of its own making could really hurt everyday Americans, from driving up their credit card or mortgage interest rates to decimating their retirement savings.

And, on the other, it’s also easy to understand why many folks don’t think a national debt default will touch them. This is hardly the first time that Congress wrapped itself in knots over problems it created for itself, or that any one of a number of politicians and talking heads declared that the financial apocalypse was at hand — only to be proved wrong. It’s not even the first time Congress threatened to keep a lid on the debt ceiling. But between this budget showdown and that sequester, the last debt ceiling fight and the more recent government shutdown, the majority of Americans found themselves, at best, inconvenienced. Why, they must be thinking, is this any different? What’s the big deal?

A Need for Context

Of course, it’s the media’s job to explain why this is more than just another partisan cat fight and what real problems Americans may face if their elected representatives yet again fail to do their job of governing — rather than their preferred pastime of posturing. And, like the politicians they cover, many in the media have focused more on the infighting on the Hill than the ultimate problems for the United States, its citizens as individuals and its reputation in the world (and in world markets).

With the media often representing the default fight as a matter of Democrats vs. Republicans, providing balance by simply transcribing whatever each side says into a microphone, what they’re not providing is the context people need (in the time they have to spend reading about it) to really understand what impact this territorialism and ungrounded ideology will have on people’s everyday lives.

It wasn’t that long ago that this country found itself in the midst of a Great Recession, with housing prices dropping, retirement accounts evaporating and huge companies — and even industries — facing extinction without a direct infusion of government money. People know what higher interest rates do to their bottom line, they know what a lack of available credit means for their everyday lives. Those who rely on government programs (like Social Security, food stamps or unemployment) are keenly aware of the dire consequences of a late — or absent — paycheck. What they clearly aren’t aware of is that this back-and-forth between politicians, who they’re sick of seeing on the nightly news, is actually about a real crisis that could send them reeling just as they’re beginning to recover.

Perhaps it’s time someone told them.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team