Home > Personal Finance > How to Trick Yourself Into Being a Better Saver

Comments 0 Comments

Money and time have a very funny relationship, and by funny, I mean, most people misunderstand it. For example: What’s more valuable to you: $10 today or $20 next month? Next year? The choice to spend or save money is a constant trade-off between having something today vs. having something tomorrow, but we are rarely trained to think about the time part of this equation.

A lot of exciting things are happening in the field of behavioral economics, which marries psychology and personal finance. New-age economists — often to the dismay of their classical brethren — are conducting studies which show that people often make irrational decisions when it comes to money. This isn’t a controversial notion: the phrase “a fool and his money are soon parted” dates to a 16th-Century poem. But some of their conclusions are controversial, as they threaten a lot of presumed wisdom about the nature of free markets.

But these controversial conclusions can also save you a lot of money.

So we are starting a new series here at Credit.com. Perhaps you’ve heard phrases like “endowment effect,” “anchoring” or “discounting.” Perhaps you even have some notion of what these things are. But somewhere between the academic papers and the theoretical arguing, the impact on your bank account can get lost. So we are going to translate these concepts for you, and show how they can save you time and money.

Instant Gratification … or Bigger Payoff?

So, back to time and money. Naturally, you’d rather have money today than tomorrow. Who wouldn’t?  If someone offered you $100 today or $100 in a year, you’d take the money today. Money in the future is worth less to you; you are “discounting” its value. In fact, if someone offered you $100 today or $101 in a year, you’d almost certainly take the money and run. You’d take less today than tomorrow, so real is that discounting effect. But there is an amount that would make you reconsider your choice. Maybe it’s $110 vs $100? Maybe it’s $150 vs. $100? Most certainly, it’s $500 vs. $100. That magic amount — which is different for everyone, and in fact, can change over time – is called a discounting rate. Economists like Joe Kable at the University of Pennsylvania actually run tests on consumers to pinpoint exactly what this rate is. Some people gladly take $18 next month over $16 today; others take $10 today instead of $50 in six months. Interesting? Perhaps only to economics geeks.

But here’s what the economists don’t say as loudly about discounting rates: Big corporations are MUCH better at discounting than most consumers are. And they make big bucks exploiting this gap.

Plenty of folks take $10 today over $20 next month, for example, which is completely irrational. They could get a pricey cash advance on a credit card to replace the $10, then take the $20 in a month, pay off the card, and come out way ahead. Heck, they could take that deal, then borrow $10 from a friend, promise to pay back $15, and still win.

But while consumers misunderstand such opportunities, corporations with good finance departments rarely do. Now, make a few million transactions like that a year, and you’re talking about real money.

Think Like an Economist

Let’s tweak the circumstances of the time-money choice and create a big change in decision-making. Say I offer you $100 in 10 years or $150 in 11 years. Most people chose the $150, and I bet you did, too, even though this decision is quite similar to the earlier quandary (waiting 12 months gets you an extra $50). That’s because both rewards come in the future, and you don’t mind waiting the extra time, since you have to wait anyway. You discount both alternatives. Now, if I give you a second chance to make the choice 10 years from now, you’ll probably take the $100 and run, again. Economists call this concept hyperbolic discounting.

How can you use the concept of discounting in everyday life? Discounting has direct and obvious implications for saving money. Would you rather have $50 this week or $50,000 at retirement? Make the right choice on that question every week, and you’ll have your $50K (if you are under 30).

The best mental exercise to help your decision-making is to imagine your “future self” as a real person, and have a conversation. After all, if you are under 30, you are going to have to explain to that 60-year-old where that $50 went. Some studies have shown that creating an artificially-aged image of consumers and showing it to them actually improves their ability to trade things today for things tomorrow.

This “ask your future self” exercise works beyond personal finance, too: other studies have shown that people who are good at imagining their future eat more healthy (they trade a cookie today for a slimmer waist tomorrow), and they are less likely to abuse alcohol or drugs (trading a high today for health tomorrow).

Another way to think of this time/money problem is to use a word your mother always used: Impatience. That’s what Theresa Kuchler did in a paper she published at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research last year called “Sticking to Your Plan: Hyperbolic Discounting and Credit Card Paydown.” It measured consumers’ ability to set and stick to plans to pay off credit card debt. A group she termed as “naive” often spent money today, thinking they would make a better choice next month — when they would once again fail to listen to pleas from their future self. That’s hyperbolic discounting in action. It’s easy to promise to start saving next month. That seems less appetizing when next month arrives, so – sticking with the above example – people take the $100 and run.

The main lesson for you:  Of course, there is a time and a place for carpe diem. But whenever you find yourself trading something tomorrow for something today, take 10 seconds to think like an economist: Ask yourself, “Am I underestimating the value this money might have to me in the future?” It’s a healthy habit you’ll use every day.

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: Burke/Triolo Productions

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team