Home > News > Target Data Breach: There Hasn’t Been Much Fraud…Yet

Comments 0 Comments

With 40 million stolen credit and debit card accounts used at Target floating around in cyberspace, you’d think everyone would know someone hit by credit card fraud by now.

Not so. Not yet, anyway. In fact, according to one fraud-fighting company, there’s little sign of an increase of fraudulent charges among Target breach victims. What gives?

There’s a difference between having your account number compromised and actually being hit with credit card fraud. One often leads to the other, but not always. At least, not right away.

BillGuard is a third-party service that lets consumers register their credit cards, then uses software to scan bills for fraud. Mick Weinstein, vice president of marketing at BillGuard, says 32,000 BillGuard customers were among those whose account info was stolen in the Target card heist — meaning they used their cards at the retailer during the nearly three-week stretch when hackers were siphoning off the card numbers.

Among those 32,000 accounts, about 2% were hit with fraud by the end of last week, Weinstein said — almost exactly the same fraud rate as a control sample of BillGuard customers who weren’t Target victims.

That suggests there isn’t widespread fraud hitting Target victims, at least for now. Of course, there have been anecdotal reports of fraud against Target victims; and only bank security officials really know what’s going on. But it seems a fraud outbreak hasn’t occurred. Why?

One possible explanation is bank and retailer back-end fraud systems are dialed so high that most of the attempted fraudulent transactions are being foiled, and consumers are blissfully unaware of that. However, selective rejection of transactions is very tricky, and criminals are pretty good at masking fraud to look like routine consumer transactions.

Another explanation is that banks have canceled or replaced many impacted cards, making them useless for fraud. However, banks are using a mixture of strategies to help exposed customers, so there certainly haven’t been across-the-board cancellations.

That makes sense: Reissuing cards is a hassle, and costs the banks real money. So many banks are taking a wait-and-see approach.

But so are the criminals.

Stay Vigilant

Hackers know their cache of stolen cards is under the fraud spotlight right now. There’s no mystery around the compromised account numbers — by now, every fraud-screening program has them loaded onto some kind of watch list. So bad guys with the “good” numbers likely plan to wait out the heightened attention.

“This was a very high profile breach, so the thieves — or those to whom they sell accounts in bulk — see more value in biding their time and waiting for card owner victims to lower their fraud sensitivity guard,” Weinstein said.

Credit card hackers routinely sit on stolen account numbers for months — or even a year or two — before attempting fraud. Eventually, banks’ and retailers’ focus on the Target cards will wane, as will the paranoia that consumers feel in the wake of the hack announcement. After all, there will be other credit card heists, and other incidents that require attention. Criminals with millions of stolen account numbers can afford to wait.

What does that mean for you? Now is no time to declare victory or end vigilance. Use your bank’s website to scan for unexpected charges at least once a week for the next several months. It only takes a few moments. And don’t forget — another common credit card hacker technique is to sneak small charges, often under $10, past banks and consumers. Hitting 10,000 cards with a $10 fraud is easier than hitting 10 cards with a $10,000 fraud. Your bank could very well miss such low-dollar fraud, and if you miss it, too, you’ll pay for it.

(Ed. Note: A sudden drop in your credit scores can be a sign of identity theft. To monitor your credit scores in the long term, you can use a free tool like the Credit Report Card to check two of your credit scores each month.)

More on Identity Theft:

Image: Tetra images

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team