Feeling stuck. It might be the most frustrating of all human experiences. Stuck under a glass ceiling, stuck in a relationship, stuck in a creative rut, stuck in your career, stuck in debt. We all get stuck, and we all hate it. It’s human nature to feel like you want to believe whatever you are doing is “going someplace,” whether it’s a love affair or a career or a bank account.

Dr. Hugh Thompson and I have spent many years studying the problem of getting stuck. It’s more universal than you might think. We learned that however bad it feels, getting stuck is a perfectly natural part of the human experience. In fact, getting stuck is written into the very code of life itself. Known also by its more scientific name of The Plateau Effect, getting stuck is written into our laws of biology, physics and chemistry. Our new book, Getting Unstuck: Breaking Free of The Plateau Effect, describes the new science of breaking barriers. We place the reasons for getting stuck into eight categories, then offer antidotes for these causes. The eight causes are: the Greedy Algorithm, Immunity, Flow Issues, Distraction, Data Idolatry, Timing, Failing Slowly, Perfectionism.

In the this exclusive series for Credit.com, I am going to show how The Plateau Effect directly impacts your money, how these eight causes keep you financially stuck, and most important, how you can break free from debt and other shackles that hold you back. Today I will start with the Greedy Algorithm, which also allows me to show you how The Plateau Effect works, why it’s so insidious and why it’s so powerful to understand.

## The Greedy Algorithm

I’m going to start right here by saying something controversial. Debt isn’t bad. In fact, paying down your debt can be a big mistake, born of the Greedy Algorithm. Now, let’s back up and tell you what this is.

All our concepts are borrowed from math and science, and the Greedy Algorithm is lifted right from higher math textbooks. Formally, it means that systems (and people) will always opt for the locally optimal solution over the globally optimal solution. Practically, it means people pick short-term gains over long-term gains all the time.  If you’ve ever grown impatient waiting for a bus and instead started walking to your destination only to have a bus pass you 10 minutes later, you have fallen prey to the Greedy Algorithm. Sure, it feels good to start walking, but long-term, you’ll be both exhausted and late when you arrive at your destination.

In fact, sometimes it’s better to walk backwards, away from your final destination. That’s called retrograde progress. How can that be true? If the subway is two blocks behind you, and it’s rush hour in New York City.

Here’s how the Greedy Algorithm works in your financial life.  Maybe you’ve heard that debt is the devil, and you should pay off all your debts as quickly as possible. That’s wrong. That’s picking a short-term gain over a long-term gain, and I’ll show you why in a moment, but first, let me explain one of the overriding principles of The Plateau Effect:

Everything works, until it stops working. Whatever you try to do in life – learning piano, speaking a foreign language, starting a business – will hit a plateau. Whatever you did to succeed will eventually fail. The only thing constant about life is change, and that’s why plateaus are so vexing. People succeed and then they start succeeding less and less, while working more and more. And they tell themselves: “But this worked before! It has to work!” So they try even harder, and that fails, too. Anyone who has ever tried to lose weight knows this principle: every diet/exercise plan works at first, and then seems to stop working. Hopefully, I will prove this concept to you in the next segment on Immunity. But if you can set aside your skepticism for just a moment, you’ll see why this is important in any discussion about debt.

Paying down debt is a very good idea, until it isn’t any more. Life is full of such plateau-born paradoxes, and they can only be solved with appreciation for balance and subtlety you learn while studying The Plateau Effect. Now, to the numbers (Hugh and I are mathematicians, after all).

Money is a zero-sum game. Spend it, and you no longer have it. So every dollar you spend paying down debt is a dollar you don’t save. BOTH saving and paying down debt are important. They should be done simultaneously, in a carefully considered balance. Don’t get greedy and go for the short-term payoff. Think long-term. Surprise: The younger you are, the more important it is to save, even at the expense of paying down debt. Here’s an example:

Say you are 25 years old and are carrying a \$1,000 balance on a credit card at 15% interest, and you get a \$1,000 bonus at work. Which is better, paying off the credit card or saving the money and paying off the debt slowly during the next year? The instant payoff of paying down a 15% interest credit card balance is obvious (it would save you roughly \$100 in interest payments, assuming you paid the card down throughout the year). But in the long run, \$1,000 saved in an IRA for 30 years will be worth \$10,935 (assuming an 8% annual return). The \$100 savings on interest payments at age 25 is worth \$830 by age 55. So, which is greater, \$10,935 or \$830? When you are thinking about money, tell the Greedy Algorithm to shove it.

Of course, there are more obvious ways that people pick short-term over long-term gains. They invest in risky stocks instead of steady index mutual funds. They buy real estate hoping for a quick buck rather than carefully saving cash. But the Greedy Algorithm shows that even too much of a good thing – paying down debt – can be a bad thing when it comes to money. Now, why is that? Because over time, we grow numb to things, a quality that we called “Immunity.” That will be the subject of Part 2.

### More on Managing Debt:

Image: Studio-Annika

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.