Home > News > Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers: Equal Pay Is Just the Start

Comments 0 Comments

If there’s one thing Washington is exceptionally good at, it’s politicizing the personal. In the past few weeks, the ongoing debate over “equal pay for equal work” has typified this type of unfair politicization – this time with women – and instead of working together on solutions to empower American women, it has only perpetuated false accusations. The President and his Democratic colleagues continue to perpetuate the myth that Republicans do not support equal pay for equal work. This could not be further from the truth.

As a woman myself – one who worked at the McDonald’s drive-thru to pay for school and was the first in my family to graduate from college – and as the mom of two young daughters, I have never once wavered in my support of equal pay for equal work. Many years from now, when my daughters, Grace and Brynn, decide to pursue their careers – whether they choose to be teachers or doctors or artists or computer engineers – they should do so without worrying they’ll make less than their male counterparts and without fear of gender discrimination.

Protections against gender discrimination exist to give my daughters and the millions of other working women in America that very peace of mind. Republicans were instrumental in ensuring passage of the two groundbreaking, bipartisan laws codifying equal pay for equal work: The Equal Pay Act (1963) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (1964).  If a woman believes she has been discriminated against in the workplace – which is both unjust and repulsive – she has every legal recourse in place to remain protected.

Nobody on Capitol Hill – neither Republicans nor Democrats – thinks it is acceptable for a woman to be discriminated against in the workplace, which is why these critical laws must be enforced.

As the 200th woman to ever serve in the House of Representatives, I am especially proud of the incredibly positive story women in America have to tell. More than 72 million women are in the labor force today, compared to just 18 million in 1950 – representing a significant and unprecedented change in our workforce. Nearly 50% of women today make the family’s financial decisions; 85% make the health care decisions; and more than half of the women in our workforce are the primary income earners in their families. This is a story that makes our parents proud. It’s a story that should be celebrated more often in Washington and throughout America. And it’s a story I will be proud to tell my own daughters one day.

But we shouldn’t just stop the debate at equal pay for women, but on better pay and better lives for women. Let’s stop politicizing women and start helping them get ahead. Women play an invaluable role in America’s economy, and they know firsthand the effects of mandates from Washington that make it harder and harder to pay the bills each month.  They make the health care decisions for their parents and their children. They start two out of every three new businesses. Women get the gas and the groceries; they write the family budgets; and they juggle work and motherhood and everything in between.

So for women to be most successful we must broaden our focus. This debate is about so much more than equal pay. It’s about empowering women with better paychecks, better opportunities, and better lives. House Republicans have advanced dozens of jobs-related bills that will help all Americans bring home more of their paychecks. We’ve promoted solutions that will give women more freedom when it comes to the health care decisions for themselves and their families – options that will lower costs and increase the quality of health care. We’ve passed legislation to improve skills and job training, so more women can get back into the workforce. And Republicans have long supported bills that would provide workplace flexibility so working parents can choose paid time off instead of overtime if that’s what they’d prefer.

What would most help women across America succeed – more than political gamesmanship ever could – would be for both parties to work together to act on these pro-women, pro-jobs and pro-growth solutions. Politicizing women won’t help them get ahead. But coming together to enact real solutions will.

Next, read Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s (D-Mass.) op/ed, Why Equal Pay Is Worth Fighting For.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: Catherine Yeulet

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team