Home > News > All Eyes on Apple’s iWallet

Comments 0 Comments

Regardless of which Apple rumor du jour you choose to believe, all indications are that Apple will unveil its new iWallet mobile payments solution Tuesday. But don’t throw away your real wallet anytime soon.  Cash is still king.

Sure, making payments using your iPhone is “cool” – particularly for millennials and those want to prove to friends, kids or grandkids that you’re hip and tech savvy. But is paying for something using your iPhone actually easier or better? Is it faster? Is it more reliable? Is it truly secure?

Celebrities Jennifer Lawrence and Kate Upton, whose intimate iPhone pictures were hacked and recently posted online, would surely have strong opinions about security. What if your phone battery dies and you don’t have your real wallet?  What about an unreliable wireless connection while trying to make a purchase?

While it does the job reasonably well, the world’s existing payments infrastructure can be frustrating, expensive and inefficient. But it will be tough to convince big and small retailers, banks, payment networks like Visa and MasterCard, wireless carriers, and most importantly consumers that the experience and economics of mobile payment is genuinely better for them. More importantly, is there enough extra money to be made or saved through iPhone transactions to make the new technology worth their while?

If anyone can do it, it’s Apple. But even Tim Cook and his brilliant team will find it hard to solve a problem that doesn’t actually exist for consumers. After all, is it really that hard to pay for something using cash, credit or debit?

Apple has clear advantages in developing a mainstream mobile payment solution, including the fact that they already hold credit card data for an estimated 800 million iTunes accounts worldwide, a number twice as big as Amazon and PayPal combined. But 80% of people in the U.S. and 95% of the world population do not have an iPhone, according to my analysis. Nearly 10% of households in the U.S. don’t even have a checking account. Approximately 20% of households are either unbanked or underbanked and often rely on money orders and check cashing outlets. To put those numbers in context, approximately 50% of American households already have some form of account with JPMorgan Chase.

No doubt, even a tiny slice of the banked population that carry iPhones is an enormous market opportunity, but the actual number of people who could have access to Apple’s new solution is far smaller – at least today – than many market-watchers assume.

Whoever can pull off the right mainstream payment solution, if anyone, could become a meaningful game changer in short order. Starbucks, for example, developed its payment app just four years ago, and it has become the most successful – if not the only successful – mobile payment solution in the U.S. Mobile payments now account for a remarkable and growing 15% of the company’s total domestic store transactions. That’s impressive. But Starbucks was in a unique position: it created its own solution that works on its own point-of-sale terminals in its own stores for its own loyal customers.

For more than 40 years now, so-called experts have forecasted the imminent demise of cash within five years. But in actuality, the amount of currency is circulation in the U.S. continues to rise – not shrink – each year. The same goes for the amount of cash being dispensed out of the nation’s ATMs. The use of cash may shrink slowly over time and to some extent get “electronified” over the next few decades.

But cash is certainly still king today and I am willing to bet every dollar in my real wallet that it will remain so for many more years to come. 

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

More on Credit Cards:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team