Home > Identity Theft > Celebrities Aren’t the Only Ones With Embarrassing Secrets…

Comments 0 Comments

Not all secrets are equal. Some are far more sensitive than others, and these require special care. If this weekend’s leak of celebrity nude photos teaches us anything (we already knew the Net was full of creeps and hackers), it reminds us that anyone can fall victim to theft of incredibly sensitive information.

I’d venture to guess that most of us would rather someone steal our credit card numbers than steal a photo of us in our birthday suit. In fact, there’s probably a few other things in your life — they’d be different for all of us — that rate nearly almost that sensitive. Maybe it’s the combination to the family post office box. Maybe it’s Aunt Bettie’s chocolate chip cookie recipe. Whatever your state secrets are, you simply must take greater measures to protect them.

In other words, you probably shouldn’t let any cloud-based service automatically back up your very personal photos.

Because I can promise you that the FBI will not open up an investigation into an incident where a criminal — or an ex-boyfriend — steals your images.

Cloud services are so easy to use — just click once and Google, or Apple, or dozens of other services will auto-magically upload every photo you take with your phone or your tablet into their cloud. That makes them easy to share. It saves space on your device. Great. But the process is so simple that ordinary people (and, I suspect, celebrities) forget it’s even happening. Snap a photo during a night of passion and, *poof*, there it goes into cyberspace, forever. I wouldn’t be surprised if most victims of this weekend’s hack had no ideas their sensitive images were on iCloud.

There’s open speculation that a relatively simple vulnerability in Apple’s iCloud service paved the way for this weekend’s embarrassing incident. The news might be coincidental, but it might not — only hours after news of the image leak, Apple fixed a flaw that failed to limit the number of times someone could attempt to log into iCloud. That meant hackers could have used automation tools to attempt millions of logins on a single account; and we all know the majority of passwords are too simple, and can’t withstand such brute force attacks.

It’s probably not fair to blame Apple. And it’s certainly not fair to blame the victims. But the fact of the matter is criminals are looking for this kind of loot to steal constantly. If you think your sensitive photos would be of no interest to a hacker, you are seriously wrong.

“Sextortion” is a growing crime with tragic results. Criminals obtain revealing photos of victims — including children — and then use them to extort more photos from them, under threat of revealing the images on a public website. The crime is so traumatic that some young victims have committed suicide. Naturally, it’s hard to quantify its frequency, but The Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force told USA Today that the number of complaints about it grew from 5,300 in 2010 to 7,000 in 2013.

Don’t Be an Easy Target for Hackers

So what should you do? Today is probably a good day to review with sober eyes what photos or other secrets you have stored in the cloud and delete those that might be embarrassing. Then, come up with a strategy to protect your most sensitive items.

See if your cloud provider allows two-factor authentication. Apple does. Instructions for adding it can be found by clicking here. Two-factor prevents someone from accessing your account even if he/she knows your password.

Long-time security expert Christopher Ambler, who blogs at blog Bit Parts, is pretty stark with his advice to clients.

“Have nothing online you’re not prepared to have leak. Nothing. Period. Ever. That ship has sailed. You may not like it, but it is reality. Rage and angst, but you will not change this fact,” he said. “If your camera is online — meaning it is your phone — you have violated number one. Don’t take a picture you wouldn’t be prepared to have posted in the clear immediately.”

Perhaps you should consider having a second, non-networked camera handy for images that you wouldn’t want grandma, or your boss or a hacker to see.

You don’t have to stop using the cloud for family portraits or dog pictures. But you can’t forget that you are using the cloud when you take private photos.

“Anything you wouldn’t have taken 20 years ago and left to be developed at a Kodak shop, you shouldn’t take with a digital camera (that’s networked) today,” said Adam Levin, chairman of Identity Theft 911 and Credit.com.

More on Identity Theft:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team