Home > Student Loans > Why Private Student Loans Could Be a Better Deal Than Federal Loans

Comments 0 Comments

There’s a consensus in the student loan world that students and their families should consider taking out federal loans before applying for private ones, and there are sound reasons behind that logic: Many federal student loans have benefits like a repayment grace period, the option of applying for income-based repayment and loan-forgiveness programs. Federal loans are easier to get for undergraduate students (they don’t require a credit check), and they tend to carry lower interest rates than private loans.

As beneficial as they are, federal student loans may not cover all a student’s education expenses, and depending on your financial situation, they may not even be the most affordable option.

Federal & Private Loans — What’s the Difference?

Your role in financing an education — student or parent — impacts the kind of loans you can get from the government. The Federal Direct Loan program is the most common kind of federal student loans, and there are a few loan types within the system. Here’s a quick description of those currently available:

Subsidized Stafford Loans: Undergraduate students who demonstrate financial need can qualify for these loans. There are limits to how much you can borrow, depending on how much you qualify to receive and your year in school. For example, a first-year, dependent undergraduate student can borrow only $5,500 in Stafford loans, and only $3,500 may be subsidized. Subsidized loans are appealing because the federal government pays the loan interest accrued before the student enters repayment, as long as the student meets the financial-need requirements.

Unsubsidized Stafford Loans: Undergraduate and graduate students can qualify for these fixed-rate loans, though there are annual limits to how much you can borrow, as determined by your year in school and other factors. The loans accrue interest from the moment they are disbursed, but you can pay the interest even before you enter loan repayment. For graduate students, Stafford loans are particularly appealing, because they carry lower interest rates than PLUS loans.

PLUS Loans: These loans are available to graduate or professional-school students, as well as parents of dependent undergraduate students. To take out one of these loans, you cannot have an adverse credit history (meaning your credit report must be free of unpaid collection accounts, foreclosure, bankruptcy, wage garnishment and loan default, among other things), but they often carry fixed interest rates lower than those offered by private lenders. Interest accrues on these loans from the moment they are disbursed, but unlike Stafford loans, there are no annual borrowing limits. Your school determines how much you qualify to borrow, based on education expenses.

Other federal loans include Perkins loan for students with what the Department of Education calls “exceptional financial need.” You can apply for Direct loan consolidation, as well. Direct loans include loan-origination fees, and Perkins loans do not.

One of the biggest differences between private and federal student loans is how a borrower qualifies: Undergraduates with no credit history can get federal loans in their own names, but the vast majority of undergraduates taking out private student loans require a co-signer, because 18-year-olds generally don’t have a sufficiently decent credit rating (or any credit history) to qualify on their own. Private student loans sometimes carry variable interest rates that start off lower than fixed federal loan rates, but over time, those rates may exceed the fixed rates, making private loans much more expensive in the long run.

Private education loans tend to have less flexibility than federal loans, as well. If you take out private loans, you need to be clear about any penalties or fees — some lenders charge you for paying your loan ahead of schedule — as well as the payment schedule you’re expected to meet: Many private loans require payments while you’re in school.

There are also benefits like consolidation, deferment, forbearance and student loan forgiveness to consider: You may not have any of these options with a private loan.

What’s the Benefit of a Private Student Loan?

Undergraduates should generally heed the advice of sticking to federal loans, but parents and graduate students may be able to find a better deal with private lenders. It depends on your specific situation, and you’ll want to carefully compare your options, but if you have a great credit history, you may want to go for private loans rather than a federal PLUS loan. Here’s why.

People with great credit scores may qualify for loan rates much lower than the 7.21% interest rate for PLUS loans disbursed between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2015. Loan rates are expected to go up annually, as they’re tied to the 10-year Treasury note. The loan origination fee can add a hefty sum to your loan balance, because this year’s fee is 4.292% of the principal, and if you shop around, you might be able to find something less expensive.

On top of that, if you think you’ll be able to repay your loan quickly and you can do so without incurring fees, going for a private, variable-rate loan may keep your costs down. Of course, if you don’t pay the loan off quickly, that strategy can backfire.

Before deciding what student loan type is right for you, get a handle on your credit standing and research your financing options. To get an idea of where you stand, you can check two of your credit scores for free on Credit.com. No matter what you decide, make sure you’re prepared to consistently meet your debt obligations, because student loan delinquency or default can seriously damage your credit, which may make it more difficult for you to obtain credit in the future.

More on Student Loans:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team