Home > News > The High-Tech Ways Debt Collectors Get You to Pay Up

Comments 2 Comments

It sounds like science fiction. A lender sitting in an office who wants a payment clicks a button on a screen, and suddenly, the borrower’s car is disabled on the side of the road. “Pay now or you’ll never drive again,” is the clear message.

It’s not a movie script. Car “ignition interrupt devices” are just the latest high-tech tool that debt collectors have deployed in their information war against borrowers.

The gadget toolbox for collectors is growing as fast as Silicon Valley. They use Facebook to connect with debtors through friends, or find borrowers using location hints. Collectors remotely wipe or disable rented laptop computers. They text at all hours of the day and night. They use social media to see if debtors have more assets — more ability to pay — than they claim. They use “machine learning” — that is, big data — to figure out the best time and techniques to contact debtors.

The expansion of collectors’ tech power has the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau concerned enough that it’s engaged in a major rulemaking procedure on the subject right now. The Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, which governs what collectors can and can’t do, was last amended in 1996, before many Americans even had an email address, let alone a Facebook account.

Stalking debtors on Facebook is probably illegal, and most debt collectors have shied away from it after a Florida judge ruled it violated state law in 2011. In that case, a collector contacted consumer Melanie Beacham’s friend, and then directly friended Beacham, looking for a payment. Judge Douglas Baird ruled it was harassment; it may have also violated federal law forbidding collectors from misrepresenting themselves.

Social media posts that consumers leave public for anyone’s perusal might be fair game, however. It’s well known that collectors look at public-facing social media sites to “asset background” a debtor, and see if they have homes, cars or other personal items that might help pay debts. Sometimes collectors go farther, too. In June, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported that a consumer who posted a picture of himself in a coffee shop with a local celebrity on Facebook was hassled by debt collectors soon after. The collector called the coffee shop and left a message for him, the consumer said.

Upping the Technology Game

Remotely “repossessing” items bought on credit takes collection tech to a new level, however. Car kill switches were highlighted by the New York Times recently, which said that some 2 million cars on the road today can be remotely shut down by lenders who believe drivers have missed a payment. The concept of remote control isn’t new, however. In 2012, a rent-to-own company was sued by the Federal Trade Commission and the state of Illinois for putting spyware on laptops it gave to consumers. The firm’s “Detective Mode” allowed it to shut off the computer from across the Internet, but it went much further, giving debt collectors the ability to take screen grabs of borrowers as they browsed their online bank accounts and take secret webcam photos in their homes. While Detective Mode clearly violated consumers’ privacy, it’s unclear if the firm would have been sued for simply turning off the borrowed computers.

Big data is, of course, a big boon for debt collectors. Data brokers who are not subject to Fair Credit Reporting Act laws gather information from thousands of sources, all of it for sale, and much of it like catnip for an investigator trying to find a borrower who has dropped out of sight. Furthermore, Equifax offers a product it calls The Work Number to collectors. The Work Number database has weekly payroll information for millions of workers at U.S. corporations, giving collectors a way to find debtors.

It’s understandable that debt collectors would be tempted to use the latest technology to find debtors. It’s a lot easier to kill an ignition switch than repo a car under cover of darkness. For their part, many collectors say their hands have been unfairly tied to prevent obvious uses of technology. In comments submitted to the CFPB as part of its ongoing rulemaking process, The Collections Marketing Center, Inc. offered a compelling example of the challenges it faces in complying with the 1996 law while dealing with new technologies.

“Some data: between 20 and 33 percent of consumers … who engage our clients’ web portals are doing so ‘outside approved hours’,” meaning during weekends of late at night. “Clearly, these are the times that are convenient for them.” The firm fears that an email response at those times might run afoul of federal law, however.

Deploying the Kill Switch on Subprime Borrowers

It’s easy to see how technology has helped tip the scales in collectors’ favor, and the impact of that can be seen in the marketplace. Spanish financial giant Banco Santander surprised everyone a few years ago when it began buying up massive portfolios of subprime car loans, right as the phrase “subprime loans” seemed the most toxic words a banker could utter. But eventually, observers realized it’s a lot easier to repossess a car than a home, and the bank’s plan was lucrative.

The kill switches are typically installed in cars purchased with subprime auto loans, which the borrowers must agree to in order to qualify for a loan.

There’s an inherent deal in the world of subprime loans made to at-risk populations. They pay high interest rates, and lenders assume high default rates to cover the non-payers. The equation has tilted in favor of lenders, however, thanks to a thriving — and often unsavory — business in third-party collections, which allows lenders to recover more of their losses. And it sets up the volatile situation with professional collectors who are willing to use any available tactic to recoup their investment in debt portfolios.

The CFPB wouldn’t comment on what it plans to do about various new technologies being adopted by collectors. It is right now sifting through 23,000 comments.

The North American Collection Agency Regulatory Association, a consortium of state and local debt collector watchdogs, said the most clear and present problem is posed by Facebook and other social media:

“Of all the newer technologies, social media appears to create the biggest threat of abuse for consumers,” it wrote in a comment to the CFPB. “While social media provides people with a means of easily sharing information with family members and friends, it also provides unscrupulous collectors with a powerful tool to harass and embarrass debtors. Unlike a text message, many communications shared on social media websites like Facebook can be viewed by many different people. It is our position that communication regarding collection should either not be permitted via social media or if allowed, very strict limitations should be imposed.”

One academic paper published in the California Law Review called “Debt Collection in the Information Age” suggested the FDCPA needed to be updated in three ways: in how it defines communication, to include technologies like text messages; to create disclosure rules and opt-out procedures for those technologies, to prevent deceptive friend requests and the like; and to consider requiring written consent for communications via mobile technologies. It was silent on more aggressive technologies like a kill switch or use of Big Data.

If you have a debt in collection, it’s almost certainly doing some serious damage to your credit score. You can see if you have any negative accounts affecting your credit scores for free on Credit.com.

More on Managing Debt:

Image: Adam Borkowski

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • DemocTheRock

    I am so glad to hear this is a reality. My neighbor has been using a car for a year and ducking the repo man. It’s really sad that people don’t pay their bills and we do.

  • BrushBack

    Only speaking to Facebook, if you accept a “friend request” from someone you don’t know, you deserve everything you get. Regardless if they’re debt collectors or stalkers.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team