Home > Personal Finance > Working More Hours Won’t Get You a Raise, Study Finds

Comments 0 Comments

Work martyrs, here’s even more bad news. You’re not getting ahead by putting in those night and weekend hours. In fact, according to a new study, you’re falling behind.

The U.S. Travel Association recently surveyed American workers and found that vacation-taking is at a four-decade low. That’s bad enough. But this nugget tucked inside the research finding could bring any overworked employee to tears.

Workers who left 11 to 15 vacation days unused during a year were 6.5% less likely to receive a raise or bonus than those who used all of their vacation days, according to the report, called, “All Work and No Pay: The Impact of Forfeited Time Off.” In other words, more time at the office does not correlate with a raise or bonus.

Not surprisingly, employees who fail to use vacation days are also more stressed. Americans who leave 11 days or more unused reported being “very” or “extremely” stressed with their work lives, compared to those who left less time on the table or took all their PTO (31% vs. 25%).

“America’s work martyrs aren’t more successful. We need to change our thinking. All work and no play is not going to get you ahead—it’s only going to get you more stress,” said Roger Dow, president and CEO of the U.S. Travel Association.

Making more money can have a huge impact not just on your day-to-day finances, but also on other financial dreams like buying a home (your income impacts how much home you can afford) or retiring with a healthy savings set aside. That’s especially scary since a recent study found that some Americans would rather die early than run out of money in retirement.

There is a silver lining in the results of the workplace study, however — it suggests a very positive strategy for climbing the corporate ladder: Take more vacations.

As with many such studies, this one reveals a mere correlation, not a causation. It’s easy to imagine that people don’t take vacations because they can’t, and they can’t because they aren’t treated well by their boss, which makes them also less likely to get a raise or bonus. In such cases, taking vacations might make matters worse. But there is some research to suggest that taking a stand on time off actually does enhance your career prospects.

Audit firm EY (formerly Ernst & Young) has found that employees who use more vacation days end up with higher performance reviews at the end of the year. Maryella Gockel, flexibility strategy leader at EY, says that according to internal research, for every 10 vacation hours an employee takes, their review scores are 8% higher. Vacation-taking slows employee turnover, too, she said.

Many workers say they just can’t afford to take vacations — even if they are paid vacations — because there’s no one to pick up the slack when they are out of the office. Gockel recommends planning for vacations far in advance, training someone so you can delegate tasks when you will be out.

Technology brings another built-in obstacle to vacation taking — the dreaded email pile-up. A survey conducted by HR firm Randstad found that 77% of those who find something difficult about taking vacations said the dreaded first day back in the office was their main deterrent.

Many employees admit to solving this problem by reading work email even while they are supposed to be relaxing. While that can be a sensible compromise, it also leads to a slippery slope.

But Gockel says there’s another good reason to leave work behind when you leave work. Not only will you get ahead, but someone else will, too.

“When you delegate to others, other people have a chance to grow while you are gone,” she said. “If you let go, other people will learn, and the show will go on.”

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: moodboard

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team