Home > Personal Finance > How to Track Your Most Ridiculously Wasteful Spending

Comments 0 Comments

Perhaps you’ve heard of Sen. Tom Coburn’s “Wastebook,” but if not, it’s a pretty simple concept. Each year, the Oklahoma senator puts out a roundup of what he deems to be egregious government spending in the previous year, and Coburn’s 2014 edition includes all sorts of taxpayer-funded projects, from an obscure educational cartoon to an event still making headlines: the rollout of Healthcare.gov. In all, he compiled 100 examples of such spending, totaling $30 billion.

To the American people, Coburn’s Wastebook can be infuriating, entertaining or a combination of the two, but overall, it’s informative. Whether or not you agree with the expenditures, it’s important to know where the money’s going. Of course, Coburn has an agenda, and his Wastebook is full of things he considers “low-priority spending,” but conceptually, it’s a good exercise.

That got us thinking: What would a personal wastebook look like? You (hopefully) won’t discover $30 billion of waste in your own budget, but you could find some pretty big expenses that you can do without. Here’s how to make your own wastebook and plug the leaks in your budget.

1. Collect the Evidence

Gather the last month’s worth of bank statements, credit card statements, check registers, envelopes of receipts — wherever your transactions are documented. If you don’t have these things now, make a goal of keeping your receipts for the next month, then you can do the wastebook.

2. Assess the Damage

Make a list of all your unnecessary purchases using your own definition of “unnecessary.” Perhaps it’s the occasional coffee run, a pair of shoes you didn’t need, or going to a movie. The point is to highlight your flexible spending, but that doesn’t mean you have to cut everything on the list. I’ll get to that in a second.

3. Identify the Worst Offenders

Categorize your purchases. You can go as broad as “eating out” or as specific as “buying a candy bar at the gas station,” but group these transactions in some way. Make a total of everything in that category, and start reviewing what you’ve calculated.

Choose three things you think are most wasteful — that might be the three categories where you spent most, or it could be the three expenses you think are most frivolous. It’s up to you. Those three things make up your wastebook, and you can set your goals from there, like cutting your waste in half or eliminating your No. 1 most wasteful purchases.

Keep in mind that “waste” can also be in the form of debt. Buying something on credit and then letting interest accrue on that purchase month after month can be a huge drain on your finances. You could be throwing thousands of dollars away over the course of your lifetime on higher interest rates due to bad credit as well. (You can check your credit scores for free on Credit.com to see whether you could be saving money by raising your score.)

Other Ideas

You could do this on a regular basis as a way to improve your budgeting process, but make sure you don’t overwhelm yourself with the task. Sure, it would be informative to make an annual wastebook of your 100 most frivolous expenses, but think about how much time that would take. Honestly, that sounds much more depressing than it does productive, so sticking to small goals may be the way to go here.

If you have shared finances, try having each party create a wastebook, and compare your findings. Much like other senators don’t share Coburn’s opinion of “egregious spending,” your partner may see essential expenses in your wastebook, so try to approach the exercise with an open mind, because it could really help you save money. Look at it this way: You’ll probably be more productive with this exercise than Congress, though that’s not exactly something to brag about.

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team