Home > Auto Loans > Is There a Subprime Car Loan Bubble?

Comments 0 Comments

Auto loans are hot. Consumers can’t seem to get enough of them, and the average loan has soared from $14,700 to $17,400 in the past five years, according to TransUnion. Wall Street can’t get enough of them either: Santander Consumer USA just sold off $700 million of its subprime loans to investors within a few hours, even though the average FICO score of the borrower was 552, and 13% had no score, according to Structured Finance News.

But auto loans are also hot for a different reason, and many observers have begun uttering the dreaded “B-word” about the market. “Bubble.”

Meanwhile, state and federal government agencies are lining up to subpoena firms that cater to less-than perfect borrowers who need wheels, known as the subprime auto loan market. Capital One disclosed in a February Securities and Exchange Commission filing that the Department of Justice has issued subpoenas looking for information on its subprime loans. Ally Financial said it has received similar inquiries from the SEC. The Massachusetts attorney general’s office has opened inquiries in a handful of lenders, according to the Boston Globe. New York City’s Department of Consumer Affairs issued subpoenas to Santander in November. And Santander recently settled a lawsuit with the Justice Department alleging it wrongly repossessed more than 1,000 cars with loans being paid by active duty servicemembers. The firm paid $9.35 million but admitted no wrongdoing.

Plenty of observers and government officials are worried that the subprime auto loan market is starting to look and act like the subprime housing market of the last decade.

“Studies show that subprime loans, which have been blamed for the country’s mortgage crisis, are growing at a staggering rate of more than 130 percent since the financial crisis,” said new York’s DCA Commissioner Julie Menin in a statement announcing that office’s probe. “For many families, especially those with low incomes, a car is one of the biggest purchases they make and if they are looking to a subprime loan, it’s because they are already struggling financially.”

Echoes of the Housing Crisis?

The subprime auto loan market might seem like an unlikely place for the next argument over Wall Street financial innovation. After all, what do dealers hawking cars to drivers with poor credit have to do with the mortgage market? A lot, it turns out — the same risk-reward calculation that was wildly profitable for banks and financiers, until the market turned against them.

Subprime auto loans carry interest rates that can be double or triple what a buyer with good credit can qualify for — rates for so-called “deep subprime” loans can climb as high as 20%. Even if default rates are high — analysts predicted nearly 25% default rates for the loans Santander sold off earlier this month, according to the New York Times — those high interest rates keep the subprime category profitable.

Other factors make subprime car loans even more attractive to investors than subprime mortgages. For starters, cars are much easier to repossess than homes are to foreclose. Even technology has made this easier – Credit.com recently reported on systems that allow lenders to remotely disable cars when borrowers miss payments.

Repossessed cars have value, too, and can be sold in used car lots, often to other subprime customers in a thriving used car market. Some cars are sold multiple times by the same dealer. And consumers also tend to pay their auto loans more faithfully than their mortgages or credit card debt, even during the Great Recession; many Americans live in places where life without a car is nearly impossible.

Santander’s $700 million bond offering promised Wall Street investors about 1% returns, according to zerohedge.com, which is nearly eight times the return that Treasury bonds are getting. With interest rates for traditional savings instruments so persistently low, Wall Street’s appetite for auto bonds seems voracious. GM Financial issued $1.2 billion in securities backed by about 63,000 car loans last year, which saw $17 billion in subprime bonds floated from January to September, according to Bloomberg.

That’s the part that has some regulators comparing auto loan market of 2015 to the housing market of 2005. The total amount of outstanding car loans is soaring, and stands at about $950 billion today, a record. Subprime loans are consuming a larger and larger slice of that market — from 20% of originations in 2009 to 27% in 2013, according to the Center for Responsible Lending. And there are other worrisome signs. Some buyers are borrowing for longer and longer terms — 96-month car loans are now being offered. The average subprime auto loan term is 71 months, or about a year longer than a prime loan. And the average monthly payment is $500, about $50 more than prime.

Some observers and government officials are expressing concern that loan standards are being lowered, or abandoned altogether, in order pump up the volume so loans can be sold off to Wall Street.

The Future of Subprime Auto Loans

There are signs of increasing trouble. Auto loan borrowers’ failure rates are rising. According to TransUnion, delinquency levels for subprime borrowers have grown from 4.2% in the third quarter of 2012 to 5.3% in last year’s third quarter. Repossessions are up, too. The repossession rate jumped 70% from the second quarter of 2013 to the second quarter of 2014. It has since dropped, but observers worry the relief is temporary.

The auto lending market continues to look and act bullish. TransUnion’s annual auto loan forecast calls for the average auto loan to rise to $18,244 at the end of 2015. If the prediction holds true, it would mean 19 consecutive quarters of increases since the beginning of 2011.
Santander, a Spanish bank, became one of the largest players in the subprime market when it spent $650 million to become the majority shareholder in Texas-based Drive Financial. It renamed the company Santander Consumer USA.
Laurie Kight, vice president of communications at Santander Consumer, told the New York Times in a statement that the lender has a “rigorous and active dealer control operation, which is part of the company’s overall compliance framework.” She added, “This operation audits, investigates and — if necessary — ceases operations with any dealers who conduct fraudulent or high-risk activities.”

Santander declined to comment for this story.

Many lenders and dealers say the booming subprime auto loan market is good for consumers, many whose credit was blemished by the recession and are in need of reliable transportation to stay employed.

Writing last year for Moody’s, analyst Cristian deRitis acknowledged some problems in the auto lending market, but cautioned against overreacting.

“Vigilance is needed to protect borrowers, but expanded lending activity with some deterioration in performance may be symptoms of a lending market returning to normal rather than overheating,” he wrote. “Instances of fraud and questionable lending need to be addressed before they become systemic issues. Yet in some respects, auto lending is a victim of its own success.” He also points out that the auto loan market, while significant, is dwarfed by the mortgage market, and a failure in the auto loan market would not have anywhere the impact of the housing meltdown.

But others worry that if left unchecked, a subprime auto loan bubble will burst with painful consequences.

“Regulators and law enforcement … should pay more attention to well-known and well-documented abuses in the auto lending market to stop increasing levels of default,” warned the Center for Responsible Lending. “Recent evidence suggests that the problems are already systemic.”

More on Auto Loans:

Image: Steve Gorton

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team