Home > Student Loans > Can Search Engines Stop Student Loan Scammers?

Comments 0 Comments

If you’ve checked your spam folder recently, you know that offers of student loan debt relief have exploded right along with the student loan debt problem. You probably know it’s a bad idea to answer spam in a quest to lower your loan payments, but you might be more inclined to answer an advertisement you see on a major search engine like Google, Yahoo or Bing. If you do, you’ll likely get a bad deal, warns the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which this weekend sent a letter to the search companies asking for help with the vexing problem.

The letter, signed by CFPB student loan watchdog Rohit Chopra, urged the search engines to more closely monitor advertising and “drive traffic towards unbiased sources of information…(so) scammers will be less likely to flourish.”

On Tuesday, the top advertisement appearing after a Google search on the topic promised visitors help taking advantage of new federal loan forgiveness programs. (A similar search on Bing and Yahoo bring up the same results.) Call, and you’ll eventually learn that the fee is five monthly payments of $199 for a program that is offered free by the Department of Education.

Chopra compared the glut of ads to a similar problem that arose when the housing debt bubble burst.

“The CFPB’s analysis of Google Trends data suggests that struggling borrowers are indeed searching for help using keywords such as ‘student loan default,’ ‘student loan forgiveness, and ‘Obama student loan relief.’ This bears a close resemblance to the foreclosure crisis, where borrowers were given conflicting information about their options and found scammers who made false promises on loan modifications in exchange for upfront fees,” he wrote in a letter to Google.

Google responded to a request for comment about the problem with a statement saying it removes millions of potentially fraudulent ads each year.

“We prohibit all forms of misrepresentation in ads, and have specific policies against ads that misrepresent financial services,” the statement read. “We work hard to keep our advertising ecosystem clean and last year alone we disabled more than 524 million ads. When we become aware of an ad that violates our policies, we’ll not only remove it, but in many cases remove the advertiser as well.”

Under federal law, it’s illegal for a company to collect a fee for debt relief services until at least one debt is renegotiated, settled or reduced.

The search companies are in a tough spot. While it’s logical to criticize them for making money through advertisements that involve student loan products that could harm consumers, search engines are not in a position to manually review every ad — and proactively removing advertisements for alleged illegal activity is tricky business. Instead, they tend to be reactive, and rely on complaints.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has warned borrowers not to work with firms that charge an upfront fee, and in December shut down two such firms. A firm named Student Loan Processing allegedly implied to consumers that it had a relationship with the U.S. Department of Education, and charged an upfront enrollment fee of 1% of the borrower’s outstanding balance, the CFPB said. The second firm, College Education Services, allegedly “guaranteed” lower monthly payments and charged upfront fees ranging from $195 to $2,500.

Consumers who are having trouble making their student loan payments have options they can explore with their loan servicers. It’s important to try to work out a manageable payment plan so that you don’t fall behind and hurt your credit. You can see how your student loans are affecting your credit by getting your free credit report summary on Credit.com.

More on Student Loans:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team