Home > Student Loans > Students Will Have $3.5 Billion of Student Loan Debt Wiped Out & They Are Not Happy About It

Comments 0 Comments

Corinthian Colleges have been in the news a lot in the last several months. It’s been a roller coaster of campus closures, lawsuits, controversy over debt and outraged students, but perhaps the biggest news came on June 8, in an announcement from Department of Education Secretary Arne Duncan: debt relief for up to 350,000 students.

Activists and former students who have been calling for Corinthian students’ debts to be discharged say the DOE’s solution isn’t enough.

A little background on the situation: At its peak, Corinthian Colleges had more than 100 campuses of Everest, Heald and WyoTech career colleges in the U.S. in Canada. Twelve U.S. campuses shuttered in July 2014, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau sued Corinthian in September 2014 for allegedly pushing students into borrowing private, high-cost “Genesis” loans. In February, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced $480 million in debt relief for current and former students who borrowed Genesis loans, but that left out many students who felt they had been wronged by the colleges and the government, which provided federal loans for Corinthian students. On Feb. 23, a group of 15 Corinthian students (who weren’t among the group whose debt was discharged) declared a debt strike, saying they would not repay their loans. Things heated up with Corinthian closed the rest of its campuses on April 27.

The Corinthian 15 (organized by an Occupy Wall Street offshoot called the Debt Collective) grew to the Corinthian 100 — they met with government officials and relentlessly called for debt discharge, something that rarely happens in the student loan world. Student loans are seldom discharged in bankruptcy, so if you can’t pay, you can spend years suffering the consequences of default, including a trashed credit standing, wage garnishment and forfeiture of any tax refunds. (You can see how your student loans can impact your credit scores for free on Credit.com.)

When the Department of Education announced the debt-discharge process for Corinthian students, it seemed the Corinthian 100 finally gotten what they wanted.

They hadn’t. A statement on the Debt Collective’s website rails against the Department of Education, Duncan and the response to Corinthian students’ requests:

“If Education Secretary Arne Duncan was truly ‘committed to making sure students receive every penny of relief they are entitled to under law’ he would sign the ‘Order for Discharge of Federal Student Loan Debts’ the Debt Collective sent him last week, immediately and automatically discharging Corinthian students’ debts. Students are entitled to receive full relief under law. The legal and most painless possible process for students is no process — they deserve an automatic discharge of their debts. … In place of this obvious option, the Department of Education’s “solution” is a bureaucratically tortured process designed to provide relief only to those who hear about it and can figure out how to navigate unnecessary red tape.”

Students whose schools closed on April 27 or those who feel they were defrauded by Corinthian must apply for relief. If all those students applied and received debt relief, it could cost $3.5 billion. While their application is processed, debtors can request their loans go into forbearance. For those who have already defaulted, the application would suspend debt collection activity on their loans.

The move has received a lot of attention, positive and negative, and the Debt Collective is doing its part to highlight what it sees as negatives. Debt Collective organizers did not respond to multiple requests for comment from Credit.com, but here are some of the tweets they’ve shared in response to the news:

Meanwhile, students can start applying for loan relief. Details on the process can be found on the Department of Education’s website.

More on Student Loans:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team