Home > Personal Finance > 5 Signs You Have the Wrong Retirement Plan

Comments 0 Comments

Are you winging it when it comes to planning for retirement? Do you have a sinking feeling that something’s not right? Here are five signs you have the wrong retirement plan, and what you can do about it.

1. You’re Paying More Than 1% in Fees

It may not sound like a lot, but it is. If you have $10,000 invested, it can either grow into:

  • $290,000 in 40 years via a mutual fund that charges 1.2%, or
  • $420,000 through a 0.2% fee fund (assuming a 10% annual gross return in both cases).

Search for the name of your retirement funds, and go to the fee section. Certain funds, including those labeled Class A, B, and C, have fees that can make them prohibitively expensive for the average investor.

The White House released a report in February 2015 criticizing the financial industry for hidden fees, which is costing working and middle-class families $17 billion a year.

2. You Randomly Chose Several Mutual Funds to “Diversify” Your Portfolio

Most of us instinctively understand the notion of diversification. So when we’re filling out our 401(k) enrollment form, we think it’s wise to choose several funds. We all know the axiom: Don’t put all your eggs in one basket.

The problem is, we’re often choosing blindly, with limited knowledge of what we are investing in. It could be really risky, too conservative or too expensive.

In this case, it may serve you better to go against your instincts and just pick one – a target retirement fund. This will automatically diversify your portfolio across major asset classes (U.S. stocks, international stocks, bonds). It will also adjust your portfolio as you approach retirement, from an aggressive one to a more balanced mix.

3. You Overlooked Index Funds

Index funds allow us to own a diverse array of stocks across various sectors, at a significantly lower cost. And remember, lower cost = higher returns.

Index funds are less expensive because they have no need to employ fund managers to select stocks that might perform exceptionally.

Time and time again, studies reveal that active stock pickers underperform the market (index funds just mirror the market). According to the 2014 study by the S&P Dow Jones Indices, more than 82% of U.S. large company stock funds underperformed the benchmark over one-, five-, and 10-year periods.

One caveat is you won’t get a chance to get outsized returns, like what Warren Buffett did for Berkshire Hathaway shareholders. Berkshire’s stock price increased by a whopping 1,800,000% between 1964 and 2014!

4. It’s All Sitting in a Money Market Fund

I get it. You realize you don’t know anything about investing, and you’ll rather keep it safe than lose your money in a risky investment. Or you can’t stomach the thought of going through another 2008 financial crisis-type loss.

But think about it. If you invested $10,000 in the U.S. stock market in 1950, it would be worth $6.9 million by 2013. That’s despite the Korean War. Vietnam War. Cold War. Oil Crisis. Saddam Hussein. Dot-Com Bust. 9/11.

In contrast, if all these events scared you off and you invested instead in U.S. Treasury bills, your $10,000 would only be worth $406,000. You left more than $6 million on the table.

5. You’re Contributing Only 5% of Your Salary Toward Retirement

If you are a recent college graduate, you should be saving about 13% of your gross income toward retirement (including matching employer contributions).

You are on track if you are 28 years old and your retirement account balance is about 50% of your gross salary. For example, if your annual salary is $50,000, your 401(k) should be worth $25,000.

If you’re 38, you should have saved about 2x your gross salary.

If you’re behind on these guideposts, you’ll need to save more than 15% of your gross pay to catch up.

Look for ways to find money in your budget, or use budgeting apps to help you achieve your monthly retirement savings goal.

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team