Home > Uncategorized > I Stink at Crafts, But I Made a Pinterest-Worthy Dresser for $30

Comments 0 Comments

It would be unkind to say I am a total failure in the world of domestic home-improvement projects. Not inaccurate, just unkind. Because I really try. And luckily for the retailers who sell dreams of being successful next time, I never completely give up.

Which is why I should stay out of stores with painted furniture. Only I didn’t (I blame my daughter for this, because she took me to one). I loved it. And how hard could painting furniture be? If I wanted to know that, I could wander down to the basement to behold the small chest with paint drips down the side, and veneer that should have been repaired before I painted, but I didn’t want to be discouraged. I wanted to shed my reputation as someone who could mess up “foolproof” directions and who really should stick with finding other people’s mistakes (editing) instead of making them myself (painting).

Besides, I rationalized, this was weekend entertainment. And also, if I turned out to be really good at this, then it was potentially a side job. Right… most people pick side jobs they are good at. One thing I was serious about: I was not going to spend a fortune on something that might turn out to be a disaster. And given my history, that was possible. Likely, even.

Getting Started

craft-2I checked Pinterest, normally the downfall of people like me, but looked specifically for painting mistakes and for tips for first-timers. I came away with some basic information that a) I needed an angled brush (still not sure why), b) the angled brush should not be the cheapest I could find (the bristles can shed and mess up your paint job), c) I should use a primer, not a paint with primer in it (bad — I wanted to make this as quick and efficient as possible), and d) I wanted THIN coats of paint, even though in my heart of hearts I did not want to see the flowery design on the old dresser peek through after I had primed and painted. Also, I wanted instant, or at least quick, results.

Armed with this advice, I went to my local home-improvement store, with a couple of drawer pulls rattling around in the bottom of my purse. (If you are truly uninitiated, you need a screwdriver to remove these. The “plus” kind is called a Phillips screwdriver and the “minus” is a standard. A further hint to help you remember which way to twist it: “righty-tighty, lefty-loosey.” That I find these useful should help you ascertain my level of expertise and skill.)

Job One was to pick a color. I already knew I wanted something with an enamel finish, and something that would clean up with soap and water. I looked in the bargain bin to see what was available. There wasn’t any water-based enamel, but there was pink-tinted primer in a small (31.5 ounce) can. Non-returnable and $1.99. Sold. Who cared about primer color? You cover that, right? No such luck with the enamel, so I looked at the colors. I selected something called “Rock Lagoon,” and the paint-mixer person mixed it up for me, wiping her paint-covered thumb on her apron, announcing, “I love this — it’s a happy color!” (It also looked like what I saw at the painted furniture store.) And I liked the saleswoman, because she did not look like she was trying hard not to sigh or roll her eyes when I explained what I was doing (I wasn’t sure) and asked about paintbrushes. I picked up a brush and a dropcloth (sort of — it was brown paper) and wandered over to drawer pulls. The ones I really loved were really expensive. I decided to wait to see how the paint job was going to go.

Diving In

The furniture victim was a little-girl dresser with a Formica top that looks like wood. The furniture was made of pressed board, exposed when the “paint” finish peeled off. I couldn’t get all of it to peel off and didn’t worry about that. Then I cleaned the piece with Windex (another Pinterest tip). Pressed board is supposedly harder to work with than actual wood, but it was easier for me, because it involved no guilt that I might be destroying something of value. So I painted the furniture tinted-primer-pink. Then rinsed the brush and started in on the enamel (the label said primer dried in 30 minutes, and it took at least that long for me to paint). You have to wait at least two hours to do a second coat of enamel. I probably waited an hour and 50 minutes because I’m impatient.

The next morning I put the dresser back together and retouched the paint (the retouching was necessary after I tried to force the wrong drawer in — if the drawers are different depths, this would be a good thing to note ahead of time). I was astonished that it kind of resembled some of the Pinterest pictures of projects that were successful. And then I stood back and thought of more ways I could spend money on this.

The people who know what they are doing often choose to use chalk paint, and then they “distress” furniture, sanding it and using stain to make it look older. My cheap furniture wasn’t going to be sanded; it had no grain to follow. After that, I think you wax the furniture (more money!) or else use a water-based varnish (who knew those existed?). So I was exempt from any desire to further distress any furniture that had already spent years in a child’s room and then been at the mercy of my “talent.” It had already been traumatized plenty. (But on the being-thrifty side, cheap furniture that would not withstand further refinishing saved me money twice.)

I had a moment of wondering what it would look like if I bought new hardware or painted the top a contrasting color. But then I remembered one crucial thing: If I “invested” any more in this piece of furniture, I couldn’t brag that I transformed it for less than $30. (And then there was the fact that I hadn’t yet ruined the furniture.) I decided to stop while I was ahead; I moved the dresser back into its place and left it alone.

More Money-Saving Reads:

Images courtesy Bev O’Shea

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team