Home > Uncategorized > Sen. Warren & Rep. Cohen: Let’s Stop Employer Credit Checks

Comments 8 Comments

By Sen. Elizabeth Warren & Rep. Steve Cohen

Bad credit can happen for a lot of reasons, but today many people have bad credit through no fault of their own. Illness, job loss, divorce or the death of a loved one can plunge a family into unexpected hard times. In difficult circumstances like these, a drop in income or taking on more debt can badly damage a credit report—even for a person who continues to make every payment on time.

For countless Americans, the fallout from the financial crisis of 2008 continues to damage their credit. Consider the following:

  • Negative credit information can remain on a credit report for seven years.
  • When home prices fell, many homeowners were unable to refinance or sell their homes, and even today those short sales or foreclosures drag down their credit ratings.
  • When customers cut back on spending, many small business owners closed their stores, and with outstanding debts or bankruptcy filings, they continue to deal with the fallout on their credit reports.
  • When employers laid off workers, many were left scrambling for jobs that weren’t there, and without the funds to pay their bills, their credit reports often remain damaged to this day.

For hardworking people struggling to make ends meet, the only way to get back on their feet is to find a good job and earn a paycheck. But even when they are able to sell their homes—often at a loss—or after they are forced to close their business’ doors or find temporary work, that bad credit history continues to haunt them.

And despite the often-desperate effort to find a job, many employers are unfairly shutting the door on applicants with less-than-stellar credit. We should call this what it is: discrimination.

Credit reporting companies that sell Americans’ personal data to potential employers have pushed the narrative that a credit history somehow provides insight into someone’s character. But, as even a representative from the TransUnion credit bureau admitted, they “don’t have any research to show any statistical correlation between what’s in somebody’s credit report and their job performance.” In fact, research has shown that an individual’s credit has little to no correlation with his or her ability to succeed in the workplace. Credit reports are not a way to screen out bad potential employees; they are just a way to discriminate against people who have fallen on hard times.

Not only are credit reports poor indicators of job performance, but in many cases they aren’t even accurate. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) reported in 2013 that as many as 1 in 5 consumers could identify at least one error in their credit reports. That’s compounded by the difficulty in correcting errors—not only are consumers often unaware an error exists in the first place, but credit reporting agencies can be frustratingly slow to respond when it comes to fixing those mistakes.

This means that one in five job-seekers could be rejected by an employer because their credit report lists a medical debt in default—even when they’ve paid off the debt in full and on time.

This is why we introduced the Equal Employment for All Act. It would help level the playing field for hardworking families who deserve a fair shake. Our legislation would prohibit employers from requiring prospective employees to disclose their credit history as part of the job application process, unless the position requires a national security clearance or a credit report is required under state or local law. It makes sure that hiring decisions are based on an individual’s skill and experience—not on past financial struggles. The bill also would stop discrimination against African Americans, Latinos and seniors who are more likely to be hit by bad credit.

This is an issue of basic fairness. Americans should be able to compete for jobs on their merits, not on whether they have enough money to pay all their bills. Much of America—hard-working, bill-paying America—has damaged credit. It is wrong to shut them out of the job market.

This is one more way the game is rigged. A wealthy person who loses a job, gets divorced or faces a family illness is unlikely to get tangled up in debt or suffer from bad credit. But for millions of working families, a hard personal blow often turns into a hard financial blow with repercussions that follow the family for years.

No one should be denied the chance to compete for a job because of a credit report that bears no relationship to job performance and that can be riddled with inaccuracies. Our Equal Employment for All Act would make sure all hardworking Americans have a real shot to get back into the workforce and back on their feet.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its partners.

More on Credit Reports & Credit Scores:

Images courtesy Sen. Elizabeth Warren & Rep. Steve Cohen

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • William Strachan

    Praise god that someone has the foresight and compassion to make an attempt to correct this disastrous mistake of possible discrimination and unfairness to we the people. when it comes to revunue production you can make a case out of anything much less credit scores.

    • http://www.Credit.com/ Gerri Detweiler

      Thanks for commenting. Keep in mind that it’s always a good idea to let your elected officials in Washington know your views as well!

  • Don

    Credit Reporting Agencies have too much control over Americans lives. They don’t report..they dictate. They have done as much to destroy lives as any other factor but are kept in operation by the corporate perfect people. Close them now!

    • April

      Start sending out letters to legislators about the crooks in the banks. It’s time someone is held RESPONSIBLE for damaging the lives of the little innocent guy. It’s not financial abuse as some ought to say, it’s outright DISCRIMINATION practices. To make matters worst I’m African American, so substantially I become a TARGET the moment they see me!!!

  • Jeffery Surratt

    My guess is the bill will go nowhere. The corporations just love having a credit reporting system that allows them to overcharge people on loans, insurance or deny someone a job, just because of a number on a report. The banks want to pay us less than 1% on our savings, but charge us 14-25+% on credit card debt; that by the way has only a 2.84% default rate.

  • bourgeoisie scum

    I noticed they cited no evidence, just appealed to authority, and emotion and about 4 other logical fallacies.

  • robertfoutch

    Why des auto insurance company need your credit score?

    • http://www.credit.com/ Credit.com Credit Experts

      Car insurance scores, too, can be tied to credit scores. Here’s more information:
      Credit & Car Insurance

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team