Home > Identity Theft > The Viral Facebook Trend That’s a Privacy Lesson

Comments 0 Comments

If you have an account on Facebook, you may have noticed posts featuring a nicely designed cloud comprised of the words that your Facebook friends use most often. It’s powered by an app from a company called Vonvon, and it’s been getting a lot of attention this week from consumer privacy experts.

The reason this app has privacy hawks screeching is simple. It grabs an enormous amount of personally identifiable information and private details about Facebook users for way too little in return.

In exchange for a graphically-appealing cloud featuring the names of your children and/or significant others, pets, the stuff of warm-hearted Aws and Ohs — and, let’s not forget, potential answers to security questions that might allow a clever fraudster to execute an account takeover — the app seems to get virtually everything there is to know about you.

Think I’m exaggerating? Here’s a rundown:

It gets your name, profile picture, age, sex, birthday and other public info as well as your entire friend list. It knows everything you’ve ever liked. It scans anything you or anyone else has posted in your Timeline. It knows where you went to school. It sees every photo associated with you, including the ones you’re tagged in on other users’ Timelines (yet another reason to review all tags before allowing them to post). It sees your hometown and current city as well as your IP address and what kind of device — even browser — you use.

In short, the app grabs what seems like an El Dorado of personal information — and all this for a pretty cloud of words and names.

Time Magazine reached out to Vonvon President David Hahn for comment. Based on that conversation, Time reported the following:

The company cannot store any user data itself. When a Facebook user interacts with Vonvon’s content, their information continues to reside in the social network’s servers, and Vonvon cannot copy the data. In fact, says Hahn, the only bit of data that Vonvon receives from connecting a user to its services is the user’s Facebook ID number, anonymized digits that let returning users access their results on the company’s various quizzes and viral content such as “Are You A Psychopath?” “Who has a crush on you?” and “Which Pixar Superstar Captures You Perfectly?”

Time checked out Hahn’s claims with a third-party expert, Jeremy Gillula, staff technologist for the privacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation, who said that it appeared Vonvon was “indeed playing it safe with user data.” The problem is that many users don’t know if an app is on the up and up, and they have to ask themselves this core question: is it worth taking the risk to find out? (This is a rhetorical question. The answer is: no, no, no!)

Regardless the actual usage of the data collected (Gillula didn’t rule out darker purposes: “Without looking at every single line of the code, you can’t be 100% sure,” he says. “There’s certainly no easy way for users to be sure.”), the Vonvon privacy policy reads like a privacy advocate’s parody of what to look out for when reading a privacy policy (and that’s the problem. In a world where you can’t know for sure, what should you do?). For instance, the privacy policy reads:

We do not share your Personal Information with third parties unless We have received your permission to do so, or given you notice thereof (such as by telling you about it in this Privacy Policy)

Worst-case scenario? They just told you that they are going to do it, so they can do it. If that weren’t bad enough, the site reserves the right to use your information even if you end your membership with the site (since when does an app require membership?):

… you acknowledge and agree that We may continue to use any non-personally-identifying information in accordance with this Privacy Policy (e.g., for the purpose of analysis, statistics and the like) also after the termination of your membership to this WebSite and/or use of our services, for any reason whatsoever.

Still not freaked out? The company’s lax privacy policy doesn’t even apply to the third parties to whom they most definitely reserve the right to sell your information.

… this Privacy Policy does not apply to the practices of entities Vonvon does not own or control, or to individuals whom Vonvon does not employ or manage, including any third parties to whom Vonvon may disclose Personal Information …

In my book Swiped, I provide some tactics for better social networking site hygiene, much of which will make apps like Vonvon’s less of a threat to your private information.

1. Change Your Name

If you tweak your name just a little, or use a nickname, life will be easier for you after a potential hack. Open more than one account. (Yes, using a slightly altered name may technically violate Facebook’s terms of service, but 80 million accounts already do it, says privacy expert John Sileo.) And don’t be scared by the argument that anonymity leads to crime, says online security expert C. Matthew Curtin: “You can do bad things anonymously, and you can do bad things using your name.”

2. Stop Geotagging Your Photos

Geotagging includes the latitude and longitude where a picture was taken. If you right-click on a photo, you can find this information under “properties.” If you are using an iPhone, look under “Settings,” go to “Privacy,” then “Location Services” to turn off location services for all applications or just for individual applications, like the camera. Even if you turn this feature off on your camera or smartphone, all photos you have already taken will contain the information.

3. Lie About Your Age

While it’s fun to get birthday greetings on your wall, your birth date is a key piece of information needed to steal your identity. Consider posting at least the wrong year.

4. Don’t Store Your Credit Card Information Online

Some social networking sites and online retailers require a credit card or allow you to save your credit card information. Buyer beware.

5. Have Some Boundaries

When social media sites ask you where your photo was taken, keep it to yourself. There is no reason to post pictures that tell a potential thief not only where your house is located, but what sort of transportation will be needed to take all your stuff. Don’t brag about new cars, especially if your photos show where you keep the keys in your kitchen. And set your privacy controls so only people you know can see factoids that could be used to create a new credit card account or the like.

6. Less Is More (Peace of Mind)

While we all have pride in the things we’ve done and the places we’ve lived, the more you tell the world about it, the more likely that information will bring you to the attention of an identity thief. Go through your Timeline and remove posts that provide personally identifiable information.

7. Deactivate Your Account

As Mr. Miyagi told Daniel-san in The Karate Kid, “Remember, best block, no be there.” You can’t get hacked if you don’t have an account.

In general, your personally identifiable information — along with the digital facts of your likes, dislikes, recent purchases and non-purchases — is worth something to the companies that collect it. Usually they offer something for it. Facebook lets you connect with friends from the past, present (and even future). Other information gathering sites, and the apps that market them or gather information for them, offer content that will be of interest to you, or provide you with some sort of convenience or entertainment. As with all things, you really should do a little personal cost-benefit analysis. Think before you blink, and don’t click any old app.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its partners.

More on Identity Theft:

Image: Rawpixel Ltd

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team