Home > Identity Theft > How Mega-Breaches Could Literally Kill You

Comments 0 Comments

It was not very long ago that information shared with your doctor was sacrosanct, at the same remove from exposure as utterances made under the protection of an attorney-client relationship or pillow talk in a spousal bed. That may no longer be the case — and the fallout could be life-threatening.

Unless you are living in a log cabin on Loon Lake and are off the grid, doubtless you have heard about the mega-breaches responsible for this paradigm shift. Unfortunately the likelihood is that the dark days of lax or nonexistent data security practices are by no means behind us.

If you doubt that, consider for a moment that it was only a year ago the media sirens alerted the world to what would be the biggest mega-breach involving healthcare information. Although it took a while for the whole story to emerge, we learned that more than 80 million customers of Anthem were exposed in a giant breach that included Social Security numbers (SSNs) and other kinds of sensitive personally identifiable information. A scant three months later, in March 2015, Premera began notifying 11 million members that personal information (this time including Social Security numbers and medical records) somehow found its way into enemy territory — swiped, as it were, by an unknown party.

The revelation that medical histories had been exposed was serious. The potential damage that could be wrought by evil-doing third parties using Social Security numbers was no small thing. The victims of both the Anthem and Premera breaches will be looking over their shoulders for the rest of their lives — forever exposed to the possibility of crimes ranging from credit card account take-overs to tax refund fraud based on the compromise of their SSNs. (If you do have reason to believe your SSN was compromised, you may want to keep an eye on your credit as unexpected changes can signal potential identity theft. You can do so by pulling your credit reports for free each year on AnnualCreditReport.com and viewing your credit scores for free each month on Credit.com.)

With the addition of medical records in the mix, there was the potential for new more terrifying kinds of attacks — extortion using the threat of leaking embarrassing, private medical information and theft of healthcare services, which could cause a person to be denied timely healthcare, not to mention all those other crimes you can’t even imagine until they are announced on the nightly news.

As if that weren’t enough, in June, the Office of Personnel Management — the human resources department of the U.S., (including its spies) — announced perhaps the most devastating breach of all. Somewhere between 18 and 32 million records were floating in the wind (possibly higher, most often pegged at 22 million). More accurately, those incredibly sensitive records were in the possession of a hostile third party. The OPM hack included millions of the most intimate details revealed (or uncovered) during security clearance evaluation background checks for present and former government employees, contractors, family members of candidates, their friends and even employees of airlines.

The latest news from the OPM breach is that the information leaked could lead to espionage for any number of reasons, many of them not quite aspiring to inclusion in a Robert Ludlum narrative. The threat was discussed recently on CNN:

“You have an enduring threat from a counterintelligence perspective,” William Evanina, the National Counterintelligence Executive and director of National Counterintelligence and Security Center, told CNN in a telephone interview. “The threat is now, and it is enduring. If they decide to compromise me, they may do it now, they may do it in three years.”

The counterintelligence campaign currently underway is specifically designed to warn current and former government employees and contractors whose information was exposed by the breach that their information could be used by an operative to strike up a conversation. Armed with personal details, this operative could quickly form a bond by talking about mutual interests or life experiences. It’s creepy, and the threat is very real.

But What Does That Have to Do With Healthcare?

Two of the above breaches include medical histories. The secrets and most personal details of the people affected are no longer secure, and the repercussions could be life-threatening.

Will people hesitate to see a doctor about a complaint that they would not want a third party to know about? Let’s say someone contracts a sexually communicated disease, and they decide rather than have that on their personal record—and risk exposure—they will purchase the antibiotics mentioned in an online article about the treatment of this or that disease. (It’s not that far-fetched. A London HIV clinic accidentally leaked 780 patient email addresses in September 2015). And let’s say that person is allergic to that prescription. Another scenario could well be a mental health crisis, where a person in dire need of help forgoes treatment for fear of exposure to hackers. That second scenario could not only result in the individual hurting his or herself, it could also endanger the lives of others.

While it is fair to counter that the above is incendiary and dire, it is not beyond the realm of the possible as breaches go from a regular occurrence to the third certainty in life. Now more than ever, it is time for the healthcare community to rise to the challenges of the date security issues that we face, and close the gates because the cyber barbarians are everywhere.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its partners.

More on Identity Theft:

Image: AlexRaths

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team