Home > Personal Finance > What I Learned About Money After My Parents Died

Comments 0 Comments

A few years ago, I came home to my apartment in New York City after having flown upstate to Rochester. I walked in the door, put my bags down, and told my roommate why I had left suddenly for a week.

“My father died,” I said. He knew that my mother had passed away six months earlier. He looked up at me from the couch and said something that I’ll never forget.

“Are you getting an inheritance? Can you buy us a new TV?”

It was, and will hopefully remain, the single most insensitive thing that anyone has ever said to me. I had come to expect such callous materialism from him, so, I was stunned but not surprised. And while it wasn’t on my mind then, the truth was that yes, I was getting an inheritance.

I was inheriting everything my parents had and, in the process, getting a crash course in the practical financial aspects of death. I picked out my father’s coffin and paid for the funeral with money from his bank account. He and I had been through this process six months earlier for my mother. It was a small comfort that, having seen his preferences for my mother’s funeral and burial, I didn’t have to wonder what he might have wanted for his own.

I was now the executor of a will. I had an estate lawyer from my father’s Rotary Club who advised me on everything and charged by the hour, rounding to the quarter hour. I had to settle every bill: every credit card bill, every cable bill, every Verizon bill. I had to buy death certificates to certify that my father was, in fact, not responsible for the charges incurred after his death. No one believes a thing without the death certificate. And it had to be the actual death certificate, by the way; a copy would not suffice.

Until it sold, I paid the mortgage on my childhood home (my father had taken out a second mortgage to pay for my college education). This was also my first exposure to property taxes. So, just to be clear, I own this house but I’m responsible for taxes every year just for the house to exist? Oh, so that’s what Republicans have been complaining about all this time. I was relieved to find out, though, that the inheritance tax doesn’t apply when assets are less than a million dollars. So, uh, relax, Republicans, it doesn’t affect most of us. (And stop calling it the “death tax.” It’s manipulative.)

As this process went on, I discovered how personal money and debt could be.

My English born father was paying off extensive dental work at the time of his death. I worked out a deal with the receptionist at his dentist’s office where I would pay installments as money became available. The dentist found out about this and sent off an angry letter saying that she never agreed to it and if I didn’t pay soon, I would be hearing from her attorney! (The exclamation mark was hers.)

My family patronized her father’s and then her dental practice for close to thirty years. But, after my father died, the only thing that mattered to her was getting paid. She didn’t say, “I’m sorry, but this bill is still due.” No, as if she wanted to provide yet another reason to hate dentists, she went straight for threatening her patient’s orphaned son with legal action. My anger didn’t last long because my estate lawyer sent her a letter saying that the money was in escrow and the matter would be settled on the closing of the estate. Sometimes it’s nice to have a lawyer.

I ended up selling my childhood home because, while Rochester is nice, I wasn’t going to move back and I wasn’t making enough to maintain a house I wasn’t living in. I would say that I grew up middle- to upper-middle-class, but after a decade of living in New York City, my suburban home looked like a palace. Three bedrooms! A full, walk-in kitchen! A living room and a dining room! A basement and an attic! This place is amazing! Surely there will be a bidding war. I chose our town’s foremost real estate broker and waited for the offers to pour in.

The first offer that came in was $40,000 beneath the asking price with a $10,000 concession. That meant that after the sale of the house, I would give $10,000 to the buyers, ostensibly for improvements.

I was pissed. First of all, my house didn’t need improvements. Well, that’s not true — it surely did — but if you want improvements, buyers, you should pay for them your selves! This just seemed like a method to improve the selling price of the house and my real estate broker’s commission.

I was dating a girl at the time who worked in real estate, and she told me that this was just business and that I shouldn’t take it personally. While I appreciated her professional opinion, I assured her that yes I actually can take it personally: This was the house that I grew up in. This was the last house either of my parents lived in. This was the wrong time to try to lowball me.

Eventually, it worked out. I got a reasonable offer and sold the house. I settled my parents’ mortgage and all their accounts. The relationship with that girl did not last. Among many other things, she wasn’t on my side about my house. Like I said, it got personal.

This brings me back to my old roommate’s heartless question and the fact that, yes, I was getting an inheritance, which felt different than say, receiving a trust fund. The trust fund kid conjures images of an underemployed hipster who describes himself as a painter without ever having put brush to canvas in his Williamsburg loft.

While my roommate may not have been an actual trust fund kid, he certainly qualified as the most entitled brat I have ever met. His father paid his half of the rent. He never had money for his half of the bills, but he always had money for video games and new bottles of bourbon and enough money go out drinking from Thursday through Saturday.

One time, I brought home some new clothes from Old Navy and as I walked through the living room, he laughed and said out loud to no one, “Yo! Rob shops at Old Navy, yo!” His parents took him on shopping trips to Barneys. I paid for my own clothes, which is why I shopped at Old Navy.

When he was fired from his job for the third time in a year, his parents sent him to Europe for a month. I prided myself on not being like him.

I had held day jobs since graduating from college. My father took me to his financial advisor while making money from my first paid internship to open a mutual fund. I lived below my means and saved. If I ever wanted something, I knew I could either afford it or not, and I made those decisions by myself, on my own terms. But this money changed things. It came along and helped my life and I often have to stick my head in the sand about the guilt that comes with that.

I used the money to realize a dream a lot of people in New York have. I bought a home: a one-bedroom apartment in Brooklyn that is roughly one-eighth the size and double the price of my childhood home. (And I tried my best to lowball the seller. No dice. I guess it’s not personal.) I had savings of my own, but without this money from my parents, it never would have happened. I was able to put down more and lower my mortgage payments. And, beyond that, I’m legally required to take distributions from their IRAs. So I receive money monthly that helps me with my payments.

All over the city rents are rising and luxury condos are being built. Working middle class people are finding it hard to live in a decent home relatively close to work. But not me: I have an apartment in long ago gentrified Park Slope. I was able to make it happen with money that I hadn’t earned.

I justify the inheritance to myself. I tell myself: I still have to work. I can’t live off of it, not even close. And I invested it pretty wisely in real estate. I didn’t blow it on a trip to Vegas, or a hip hop vanity video. But I have this advantage. I have a safety net that I’m sure my parents would want me to have, even if it meant that they wouldn’t be around to see me enjoy it.

This post originally appeared on the Billfold. It is an Op/Ed contribution and does not necessarily represent the views of Credit.com or its partners. The content has been edited from its original version in keeping with Credit.com’s editorial policies.

More From the BillFold:

Image: Ingram Publishing

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team