Home > Credit Score > Help! I Got an Error Off My Credit Report, But My Score Didn’t Go Up

Comments 0 Comments

One of the most frustrating things about having errors on your credit reports is how they can unfairly damage your credit scores. Once the credit report error has been fixed, you probably expect your credit scores to go up. But that’s not necessarily what will happen, as one of our readers recently learned.

“Around Jan. of this year I had a medical bill go into collections by way of error. I have a perfect payment history (since 35 — I’m now 45) and my total credit usage always hovers between 20 and 30%. I have never been late on any payment and have no missed payments. This collection was an error from the doc’s office due to misfiling, and I contacted all 3 credit agencies as well as the doc, and it was determined to be an error and it was removed. When it originally hit, it dropped my score from 690 to 540, but after it was removed there has been no change. It was removed in early Feb., and my score today is 569 (Vantage 3.0 is the reference score each time I check). Nothing new in my account, and no major changes to utilization. … I feel like once the erroneous collection came off, my score should have jumped back up to around what it was prior, the high 600s.” — Chris Betz

As is often the case with credit scores, the answer to Chris’ question is complicated.

“Without viewing this consumer’s actual report, it is difficult to say why the score has not changed since the dispute was removed,” Kristine Snyder, a spokeswoman for the credit bureau Experian, said in an email. “Score increases and decreases will be dependent on other items on the report, and since each person’s credit history is different, there isn’t a definitive answer as to how much a score could be impacted from certain activities.”

That’s probably not a satisfying answer, but Chris’ situation highlights the complexity of credit scoring and how easily scores can fluctuate, even after what seems like the slightest change to your credit history.

Jeff Richardson, a spokesman for VantageScore Solutions, suggested Chris contact the credit reporting agencies to ask why his score hasn’t gone up more since the error was removed. And even though Chris said there haven’t been “major changes” to his credit utilization — how high his credit card balances are relative to his cards’ credit limits — that’s still a likely culprit behind his low score, assuming everything else remained constant. What Chris might consider a minor change to his credit utilization may actually be a big deal when it comes to his credit scores.

“Oftentimes it’s the utilization on a credit card at the time the score is pulled that is keeping the score low,” Richardson said in an email. (You can keep track of changes to your utilization and other things affecting your credit by getting a free credit report summary every 30 days on Credit.com.)

Generally, it’s hard to isolate one item’s impact on your credit score, given how many things affect it and how often those things change. Even if all things remain constant, getting an error off your credit score may not give you the credit score bump you’d like.

“There could be significant improvement quickly if there is no other negative information remaining,” Snyder said. “However, you could see very little change if there still are late payments or public records – court judgments, tax liens or bankruptcy – in your credit history, especially if the remaining negative information is more recent.”

There’s always the possibility of an error elsewhere on your report that could be dragging down your score. A lower-than-expected credit score can also be a sign of identity theft, which further emphasizes the importance of regularly checking your credit and reviewing your free annual credit reports.

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: gpointstudio

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team