Home > Personal Finance > I’m in College. Should I Start Saving for Retirement?

Comments 0 Comments

It is never too early to start saving for retirement. In fact, the sooner you start, the less you will need to save in the long run. This means more money in your pocket to spend on non-retirement over your lifetime, and if you want to retire early rather than working to 65 or 70 like so many Americans, this is your golden ticket.

The Power of Compounding Interest

As a millennial, you have the greatest retirement tool: time. It’s a commodity that you can’t get back as you get older and one many boomers would be jealous of. The earlier you start investing, the more time you’ll have to let compounding work for you. You add less now but have more later. Use a retirement calculator to determine your savings goal, a compounding tool to see the numbers, then create a plan and stick with it.

It can be difficult for a young person to save big money during and right after college, considering many students only work part-time or not at all while in school. Entry-level salaries may also not provide a big savings cushion, and high levels of student loan debt, too, can eat into a young person’s savings.

However, let’s assume for illustrative purposes that Christine saved $600 per month in college for 5 years, from the time she turned 18 until she turned 23. She saved $1,000 per month for 7 years after college when she began working, from 23 until she turned 30. After those 12 years, she stopped saving and left the money in her account, where it continued to accumulate interest at an annual rate of 5% until she retired at age 65.

Now let’s compare her to Jason, who didn’t start saving until after college on his 24th birthday, when he got his first “real” job. He put away $1,000 per month for 13 years, until he turned 37. He also left the money in his account, where it continued to accumulate interest for 28 years at a rate of 5% per year until he turned 65.

Over a 13-year period, Jason contributed about $156,000 and, over a 12-year period, Christine contributed about $120,000. Christine saved $36,000 less than Jason, but she wound up with about $21,000 more than Jason had saved for retirement. Remember, she also saved for one year less than he did.


If Christine chooses, she can stop contributing at age 30 and have more money in her pocket for other goals (if she has determined that this retirement amount at age 65 is sufficient). Jason, on the other hand, is saving in his 30s when other constraints like starting a family or mortgage payments may make it difficult to save for retirement.

Christine can use that money from age 30 to 36 to travel, save for a house or add to her retirement account to help it grow even more. The latter would very easily contribute to the possibility of her retiring earlier than 65, creating a more secure retirement and helping to ensure that she will not need to work due to poor planning. The point is, she has more options – saving earlier has created the financial freedom to let her live the life that she wants.

How to Super-Charge Your Savings

These results can be further enhanced by utilizing an employer match in a deferred plan such as a 401K to reduce your actual weekly out-of-pocket contribution to your retirement account. Plus, it’s free money (as long as you meet your company’s vesting requirements).

The bottom line is, saving is like a muscle; it takes discipline, much like going to the gym. Start slow and early and keep building, and you lessen the chance that you may face the painful task of trying to catch up later in life.

You can consider consulting a Certified Financial Planner (CFP®) for comprehensive advice on calculating your retirement goal amount and strategies to support savings for this and other life goals. (Full disclosure: I am a CFP®.) And as you work toward those goals, you can see how your habits are affecting your credit by viewing two of your credit scores, updated each every 14 days, for free on Credit.com.

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: Porta

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team